Abstract:We investigate the issue in determining the significance of candidate transient gravitational-wave events in a ground-based interferometer network. Given the presence of non-Gaussian noise artefacts in real data, the noise background must be estimated empirically from the data itself. However, the data also potentially contains signals, thus the background estimate may be overstated due to contributions from signals. It has been proposed to mitigate possible bias by removing single-detector data samples that pass a multi-detector consistency test from the background estimates. We conduct a high-statistics Mock Data Challenge to evaluate the effects of removing such samples, modelling a range of scenarios with plausible detector noise distributions and with a range of plausible foreground astrophysical signal rates. We consider the two different modes: one in which coincident samples are removed, and one in which all samples are retained and used. Three algorithms were operated in both modes, show good consistency with each other; however, discrepancies arise between the results obtained under the "coincidence removal" and "all samples" modes, for false alarm probabilities below a certain value. In most scenarios the median of the false alarm probability (FAP) estimator under the "all samples" mode is consistent with the exact FAP. On the other hand the "coincidence removal" mode is found to be unbiased for the mean of the estimated FAP. While the numerical values at which discrepancies become apparent are specific to the details of our experiment, we believe that the qualitative differences in the behaviour of the median and mean of the FAP estimator have more general validity. On the basis of our study we suggest that the FAP of candidates for the first detection of gravitational waves should be estimated without removing single-detector samples that form coincidences.

Injection Error Analysis of Space Gravitational Wave Detection

Error Analysis of Spherical Scanning Mechanism Used for Surface Defects Detection

Accuracy Analysis of Centroid Detection Method Used to Star Sensor

Pointing and tracking errors due to low-frequency deformation in inter-satellite laser communication

Orbit insertion error analysis for a space-based gravitational wave observatory

Uncertainty Evaluation and Optimization of INS Installation Measurement Using Monte Carlo Method

Error Modeling and Compensation of Circular Motion on a New Circumferential Drilling System

Quantitative analysis of SINS attitude Drift error in high dynamic

Centroid Measurement Error Of Cmos Detector In The Presence Of Detector Noise For Inter-Satellite Optical Communications

Influence of the Injection Bias on the Capacitive Sensing of the Test Mass Motion of Satellite Gravity Gradiometers

Analysis on error propagation in velocity vector synthesis of deep-space celestial autonomous navigation based on radial velocity measurement

Analysis of Telescope Wavefront Aberration and Optical Path Stability in Space Gravitational Wave Detection

Accuracy limitations of existing numerical relativity waveforms on the data analysis of current and future ground-based detectors

Systematic errors in estimation of gravitational-wave candidate significance

Data analysis of gravitational-wave signals from spinning neutron stars. II. Accuracy of estimation of parameters

A New Method for Rendezvous Remote Guidance Terminal Error Analysis Based on CW Equation

Gravitational anomaly detection using a satellite constellation: Analysis and simulation

Terminal Accuracy Analysis of a Multi-level Hybrid Support System Based on Time-varying Barycenter

Effect Analysis of Orbital and Attitude Parameter Error on TDI-CCD's Line-shift Frequency and Veer Angle

Performance Analysis and Error Budget for Gravity-Measuring Satellite

Measuring violations of General Relativity from single gravitational wave detection by non-spinning binary systems: higher-order asymptotic analysis