Volumetric Laser Endomicroscopy (VLE) Can Target Dysplasia at the GEJ/Gastric Cardia in the Absence of Visible Lesions: A Case Series

Nina R. Gupta,Uzma D. Siddiqui,Irving Waxman,Christopher G. Chapman,Ann Koons,Vesta Valuckaite,Shu-Yuan Xiao,Namrata Setia,John Hart,Vani J. Konda
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14309/00000434-201610001-01510
2016-01-01
Abstract:Background: Dysplasia detection during surveillance endoscopy of Barrett's esophagus has improved with the use of advanced imaging such as digital chromoendoscopy. However, most imaging tools do not allow for examination below the mucosal surface. VLE is an optical coherence tomography (OCT) modality that provides cross-sectional imaging from the surface to a depth of 3mm with 7μm resolution. Cases: We present 3 cases involving patients who had undergone endotherapy and presented for followup. These patients had dysplasia at the GEJ/cardia and abnormal VLE imaging in this region despite no suspicious visible lesion at that anatomical level. Case 1: A 70 year old man who had undergone EMR and RFA for HGD and LGD presented for follow-up. On white light endoscopy and narrow band imaging (WLE/NBI), residual islands of BE were identified from 36 (GEJ) to 27cm and two areas of erosion, friability, and irregular pit pattern at 34 and 35cm were found. Though no abnormal lesions were found at the GEJ/cardia, several abnormal VLE features were found in this area including irregular surface, heterogeneous scattering, anomalous glands, and submucosal glands. Biopsies taken from this level revealed low grade dysplasia (LGD). Case 2: An 80 year old man with multifocal dysplasia after endoscopic treatment with EMR and RFA presented for further management. On WLE/NBI, BE was identified from 35 (GEJ) to 29cm and an area of nodularity was found 5cm proximal to the GEJ. No visible lesions were identified at the GEJ/cardia. VLE imaging in this area showed irregular surface, heterogeneous scattering, anomalous glands and biopsy from this level revealed LGD. Case 3: A 68 year old man had previously undergone EMR for a benign subepithelial nodule presented for follow-up of BE. On WLE/NBI, BE was seen continuously from 42 (GEJ) to 40cm along with scattered islands at 39cm. No discrete lesions were found at the GEJ/cardia. VLE imaging in this area however was notable for irregular surface, heterogeneous scattering, and anomalous glands. Biopsy from this level revealed LGD. Discussion: The GEJ and gastric cardia are challenging to assess in the post-therapy session. LGD can be particularly difficult to identify and may be missed by endoscopy alone. Abnormal VLE imaging features at the GEJ/gastric cardia may signal dysplasia in the absence of a visible lesions identifiable by WLE/NBI. The utilization of VLE in the absence of a visible lesion may improve diagnostic yield.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?