Abstract:BACKGROUND:In biomedical information extraction, event extraction plays a crucial role. Biological events are used to describe the dynamic effects or relationships between biological entities such as proteins and genes. Event extraction is generally divided into trigger detection and argument recognition. The performance of trigger detection directly affects the results of the event extraction. In general, the traditional method is used to address the trigger detection as a classification task, as well as the use of machine learning or rules method, which construct many features to improve the classification results. Moreover, the classification model only recognizes triggers composed of single words, whereas for multiple words, the result is unsatisfactory.RESULTS:The corpus of our model is MLEE. If we were to only use the biomedical LSTM and CRF model without other features, the F-score would reach about 78.08%. Comparing entity to part of speech (POS), we find the entity features more conducive to the improvement of performance of detection, with the F-score potentially reaching about 80%. Furthermore, we also experiment on the other three corpora (BioNLP 2009, BioNLP 2011, and BioNLP 2013) to verify the generalization of our model. Hence, F-scores can reach more than 60%, which are better than the comparative experiments.CONCLUSIONS:The trigger recognition method based on the sequence annotation model does not require initial complex feature engineering, and only requires a simple labeling mechanism to complete the training. Therefore, generalization of our model is better compared to other traditional models. Secondly, this method can identify multi-word triggers, thereby improving the F-scores of trigger recognition. Thirdly, details on the entity have a crucial impact on trigger detection. Finally, the combination of character-level word embedding and word-level word embedding provides increasingly effective information for the model; therefore, it is a key to the success of the experiment.

A Tree-Based Neural Network Model for Biomedical Event Trigger Detection.

Gated Tree-Structured RecurNN for Detecting Biomedical Event Trigger

A Two-Stage Biomedical Event Trigger Detection Method Based on Hybrid Neural Network and Sentence Embeddings

Biomedical event trigger detection by dependency-based word embedding

A Context-enhanced Neural Network Model for Biomedical Event Trigger Detection

Biomedical Event Trigger Detection Based on Convolutional Neural Network

Child_Sum EATree-LSTMs: Enhanced Attentive Child_Sum Tree-LSTMs for Biomedical Event Extraction

FBSN: A Hybrid Fine-Grained Neural Network for Biomedical Event Trigger Identification.

Biological Event Trigger Identification with Noise Contrastive Estimation.

Child-Sum EATree-LSTMs: Enhanced Attentive Child-Sum Tree-LSTMs for Biomedical Event Extraction.

Exploiting Argument Information to Improve Biomedical Event Trigger Identification Via Recurrent Neural Networks and Supervised Attention Mechanisms.

Biomedical Event Trigger Detection Based on BiLSTM Integrating Attention Mechanism and Sentence Vector.

Biological Event Trigger Word Extraction Based on Deep Syntactic Parsing

Exploring Useful Features for Biomedical Event Trigger Detection

Biomedical Event Trigger Detection Based on Hybrid Methods Integrating Word Embeddings.

Topic-informed Neural Approach for Biomedical Event Extraction.

Research on identification of biomedical event trigger

Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory with CRF for Detecting Biomedical Event Trigger in FastText Semantic Space

Biomedical Event Trigger Detection Based on Bidirectional LSTM and CRF.

Contextual Label Sensitive Gated Network for Biomedical Event Trigger Extraction.

Trigger Detection Based on Bidirectional LSTM and Two-stage Method