USE OF LUTEINIZING HORMONE SUPPLEMENTATION FOR OVARIAN STIMULATION IN IVF/ICSI CYCLES OF WOMEN WITH GOOD OVARIAN RESERVE.

Liang Hsuan Chen,Tzu-Hsuan Chin,Ya-Chiung Hsu,Shang Yu Huang,Hsing-Tse Yu,Hsien-Ming Wu,Chia-Lin Chang,Hong-Yuan Huang,Hsin-Shih Wang,Yung-Kuei Soong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.692
IF: 6.7
2019-01-01
Fertility and Sterility
Abstract:To declare current evidence exploring the added value of LH supplementation to FSH following GnRH antagonist protocol in women with good ovarian preserve. We conducted a retrospective analysis exploring the benefit for pregnancy achievement of LH supplementation to GnRH antagonist cycles in women with AMH level over 5ng/mL. A total of 255 women with AMH≧5 undergoing IVF/ICSI using a GnRH antagonist protocol was included. Of these, 148 were received treatment with recombinant FSH (r-FSH) + human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) and 107 with r-FSH alone through the ovarian stimulation. We observed a significantly lower serum LH levels at the beginning of cycle, the day of GnRH antagonist administration and the day of oocyte triggering in the combination of r-FSH+HMG group. The treatment days and total gonadotrophin dose was significantly higher in r-FSH+HMG group compared with r-FSH alone group. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the number of oocytes retrieved, maturation, fertilization, and blastocyst formation rate. The OHSS occurred 8% of the r-FSH+HMG group, whereas 8% OHSS developed in the rFSH alone group. There were no difference in pregnancy outcome between the groups. LH supplementation to r-FSH following GnRH antagonist does not seem to significantly augment serum E2 level on the trigger day and further pregnancy outcome in patient with good ovarian reserve. However, LH supplement seems to have a benefit in some normo-gonadotropic women, who developed LH deficiency following GnRH antagonist. An accurate definition of the LH threshold in GnRH antagonist cycles may contribute to the discussion of which subgroups of women may benefit from adjuvant LH therapy.Tabled 1Ovarian stimulationr-FSH (n=107)r-FSH+m-LH (n=148)P valueTotal gonadotropin dose(IU)1498+/-3862408+/-701<0.001<0.001Total FSH dose(IU)1498+/-3862005+/-526Total LH dose(IU)-403+/-276Duration of stimulation(days)8.5+/-1.19.1+/-1.3<0.001LH on day of antagonist(IU/L)4.1+/-4.62.7+/-2.90.005E2 on day of antagonist(pg/mL)807.8+/-412.3723.8+/-483.70.148LH on day of trigger(IU/L)3.1+/-2.52.1+/-1.7<0.001E2 on day of trigger(pg/mL)2901.6+/-1516.92449.1+/-1406.00.017No. of oocytes18.2+/-8.017.4+/-8.50.464No. of metaphase II15.7+/-8.114.3+/-8.20.176Blastocyst formation rate(%)57.7+/-31.762.6+/-54.80.419No. of transferred embryos2.0+/-0.52.1+/-0.50.836No. of cryopreserved embryos6.2+/-3.86.4+/-3.90.761Ovarian hyperstimulation(%)10 (9)12 (8)0.730Pregnancy rate per ET(%)48/82(59)65/96(68)0.209Live birth rate per ET(%)27/82(33)45/96(47)0.715Cumulative live birth rate(%)63/107(59)91/148(61)0.585 Open table in a new tab
What problem does this paper attempt to address?