Evaluating Objective and Subjective Frequency Measures in L2 Lexical Processing

Xiaocong Chen,Yanping Dong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.102738
IF: 0.916
2019-01-01
Lingua
Abstract:The superiority of the subjective frequency measure over objective corpus frequency measures in L1 lexical research has long been debated, but a systermatic investigation into this issue in the L2 context is still lacking. To bridge the gap, the present study explored the relations between six typical English corpus frequency norms and subjective frequency ratings collected from L2 English learners, and assessed their predictive power on L2 English lexical-decision data. The results revealed that despite strong correlations between the two types of frequency measures, larger discrepancies were detected in the lower frequency range, and that in general the subjective measure explained extra variance of L2 lexical processing data, especially for low-frequency words. But for high-frequency words, some corpus frequency norms (e.g., SUBTLEX-US) also showed equally good predictive power. Methodological implications for the selection of frequency measures in L2 research are discussed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?