Ground Motion From M-W 1.5 To 3.9 Aftershocks Of The 2014 M-W 6.2 Jinggu Earthquake At Hypocentral Distances < 45 Km In Yunnan, China

Mengyao Sun,Huiyu Zhu,Jie Zhang,Haohuan Fu,Xiao Tian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190127
2019-01-01
Seismological Research Letters
Abstract:The ground motion from small aftershocks of the 2014 M-W 6.2 Jinggu earthquake in Yunnan Province is analyzed. With the seismic records, we assess the site conditions and develop a ground-motion prediction equation (GMPE) for this region. The strong-motion duration is also calculated to further understand the potential seismic hazard to nearby structures. The dataset includes 504 events with M-W 1.5-3.9 and 2956 three-component records at hypocentral distances <45 km from 10 stations operated by the Earthquake Administration of Yunnan Province. The ground-motion amplification factor derived from the horizontal-to-vertical (H/V) spectral ratio of each station ranges from 1.1 to 5.2 (0.04-0.72 in log units). The time-averaged shear-wave velocity to 30 m depth (V-S30) for seismographic stations is estimated using fundamental frequencies associated with peak H/V ratios. GMPE is obtained using the entire dataset. The values of the geometrical spreading coefficient for the pseudoabsolute response spectral acceleration (PSA) at a frequency of 10 Hz suggest higher decay than those for the peak ground velocity, peak ground acceleration (PGA), and PSA at other frequencies. The significant duration (D-s) of strong ground motion systematically decreases with PGA but increases with hypocentral distance. However, no strong correlation is observed for D-s and magnitude or for D-s and V-S30. The results of this study are compared with analogous research (Babaie Mahani and Kao, 2018) on induced earthquakes with the same distance-magnitude range. The comparison indicates that the decay of ground-motion amplitudes with hypocentral distance in our case is generally lower than that in the other study. The D-s trends are consistent in the two studies, although the longest strong-motion duration in the two cases apparently differs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?