Ruptured Uterus after Buccal Oxytocin
J. Chalmers,June Ng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.5416.1070
1964-10-24
British Medical Journal
Abstract:SIR,-We have just had an opportunity of studying your issues containing records of rupture of the uterus following buccal oxytocin (12 September, p. 689, and 3 October, p. 876) and your leading article (19 September, p. 705). Since we began our study of this method we have induced 206 cases with what Mr. H. 0. Nicholson (3 October, p. 876) describes as the " Worcester course." During this time we have had four cases only of hypertonicity of the uterus, and in all of these relaxation followed rapidly after removal of the tablets from the mouth and washing out with cold water. In none of these was the foetal heart disturbed, and in 17 cases which had shown some disturbance of the foetal heart primary abnormalities of the placenta such as infarction, calcification, etc., were observed, as reported in a paper read last week to the Fourth World Congress of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Mar del Plata, Argentina. We have felt, however, that the dosage was unnecessarily large, and therefore for the last 12 months we have been experimenting with lower dosages. Starting with a dose of 50 mg. instead of 100 mg., and a build-up leading to half the original total, we have treated 100 cases with 79% success, and no instance of hypertonicity. In an attempt to reduce the dosage still further, the most recent series, now amounting to 17 cases with 100% success, has used an initial dosage of 25 units. In this most recent series the total dosage required for each induction has averaged 837 units. It may be that we shall be able to reduce the dosage still further, but our study continues and we hope to publish our results in the course of the next few months. In 323 cases, therefore, we have had only four instances of uterine hypertonicity, which were easily controlled by removing the tablets and washing out the mouth. There has been no rupture of the uterus and no case in which we were unduly anxious about the foetal heart. In your leading article you stress the necessity of careful selection of cases and of close and continuous observation in a fully equipped hospital maternity unit. We are, of course, entirely in agreement with this, and indeed pointed it out in our recent paper.' In Mr. P. M. Leney's case (12 September, p. 689) it seems probable that the rupture of the uterus occurred not less than two hours after the completion of her course of buccal oxytocin, and this therefore may have been spontaneous rather than due to the therapy. In the case reported by Mr. Nicholson, however, the rupture of the uterus seems to have followed more closely on the completion of the course of treatment, and one cannot so clearly exculpate the drug in this instance. While we would not wish to minimize the seriousness of even a small number of cases of uterine rupture, we would point out that spontaneous rupture of the uterus does occur without medication. We feel that it would be a pity if a valuable method were to be abandoned, and we believe that buccal oxytocin offers a method of induction which has many advantages over the intravenous drip, and-particularly in the reduced dosage which we are now using-appears to be safe provided the same careful supervision required for any oxytocin induction is employed in this field also.-We are, etc., J. A. CHALMERS. Ronkswood Hospital, J. L. NG. Worcester.