Diagnosis: History, Physical Examination, Imaging, and Arthroscopy: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle
Christiaan J. A. van Bergen,O Baur,Christopher D. Murawski,Pietro Spennacchio,Dominic S. Carreira,Stephen Kearns,Adam Mitchell,Hélder Pereira,Christopher J. Pearce,James Calder,Jakob Ackermann,Samuel B. Adams,Carol L. Andrews,Chayanin Angthong,Jorge Batista,Steve Bayer,Christoph Becher,Gregory C. Berlet,Lorraine A. T. Boakye,Alexandra J. Brown,Roberto Buda,Gian Luigi Canata,Thomas O. Clanton,Jari Dahmen,Pieter D’Hooghe,Christopher W. DiGiovanni,Malcolm E. Dombrowski,Mark C. Drakos,Richard D. Ferkel,Paulo N. F. Ferrao,Lisa A. Fortier,Mark Glazebrook,Eric Giza,Mohamed Gomaa,Simon Görtz,Amgad M. Haleem,Kamran S. Hamid,László Hangody,Charles P. Hannon,Daniël Haverkamp,Jay Hertel,Beat Hintermann,MaCalus V. Hogan,Kenneth J. Hunt,Eoghan T. Hurley,Jón Karlsson,John G. Kennedy,Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs,Soo Hyun Kim,Siu Wah Kong,Sameh A. Labib,Kaj T. A. Lambers,Jin Woo Lee,Keun Bae Lee,Jeffrey S. Ling,Umile Giuseppe Longo,Alberto Marangon,Graham McCollum,Peter N. Mittwede,Stefan Nehrer,Philipp Niemeyer,James A. Nunley,Martin J. O’Malley,David O. Osei-Hwedieh,Jochen Paul,Adam Popchak,Marcelo Pires Prado,Steven M. Raikin,Mikel L. Reilingh,Benjamin B. Rothrauff,Lew C. Schon,Yoshiharu Shimozono,Helene Simpson,Niall A. Smyth,Carolyn M. Sofka,James W. Stone,Martin Sullivan,Masato Takao,Yasuhito Tanaka,David B. Thordarson,Rocky S. Tuan,Víctor Valderrábano,C. Niek van Dijk,Pim A.D. van Dijk,Francesca Vannini,Tanawat Vaseenon,Markus Walther,Martin Wiewiorski,Xiangyang Xu,Youichi Yasui,Yinghui Hua,Ichiro Yoshimura,Alastair Younger,Zijun Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100718779393
IF: 3.569
2018-01-01
Foot & Ankle International
Abstract:The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on "Diagnosis: History, Physical Examination, Imaging, and Arthroscopy" developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle.Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed upon in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus: 51 - 74%; strong consensus: 75 - 99%; unanimous: 100%.A total of 12 statements on the diagnosis of cartilage injuries of the ankle reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Two achieved unanimous support and 10 reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). All statements reached at least 86% agreement.This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians in the diagnosis of cartilage injuries of the ankle.