Effectiveness and Safety of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging-Guided Hepatectomy for Liver Tumors: A Systematic Review and First Meta-Analysis.

Chi Qi,Hao Zhang,Yue Chen,Song Su,XiaoFeng Wang,XinQiao Huang,Cheng Fang,Bo Li,XianMing Xia,Pan He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.10.007
IF: 3.577
2019-01-01
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Abstract:BackgroundThis meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging-guided hepatectomy(FIGH) for liver tumors.MethodsClinical studies were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Medline and Web of Science electronic databases. Primary outcomes included operative time, blood loss, blood transfusion, hospital stay, R0 resection, postoperative complications, postoperative mortality and 1-year recurrence rate. Study-specific effect sizes and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined to calculate the pooled value using a fixed-effects or random-effects model.ResultsSix studies comprising 587 patients were included. Major operative time (mean difference [MD] = ˗55.45; 95% CI = -78.85– -32.05), blood loss (MD = 12.99; 95% CI = 12.00–13.97), hospital stay (rate difference [RD] = -12.61; 95% CI = -15.06– -10.17), and postoperative complications (RD = -0.07; 95% CI = -0.12– -0.01) were all less in the FIGH group than in the traditional hepatectomy(TH) group. No differences were found in blood transfusion, R0 resection or 1-year recurrence rate. No perioperative mortality was observed in either group.ConclusionBased on current evidence, applying indocyanine green fluorescence imaging technology to accurately diagnose and treat liver tumors can effectively reduce operative time, blood loss, hospital stay and postoperative complications.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?