MRI Evaluation of Extramural Vascular Invasion by Inexperienced Radiologists

Shuai Wang,Xiao-Ting Li,Xiao-Yan Zhang,Rui-Jia Sun,Yu-Hong Qu,Hui-Ci Zhu,Zhen Guan,Ying-Shi Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20181055
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective: We proposed to determine whether the performance of inexperienced radiologists in determining extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) in rectal cancer on MRI can be promoted by means of targeted training. Methods: 230 rectal cancer patients who underwent pre-operative chemoradiotherapy were included. Pre-therapy and post-therapy MR images and pathology EMVI evaluation were available for cases. 230 cases were randomly divided into 150 training cases and 80 testing cases, including 40 testing case A and 40 testing case B. Four radiologists were included for MRI EMVI evaluation, who were divided into targeted training group and non-targeted training group. The two groups evaluated testing case A at baseline, 3month and 6month, evaluated testing case B at 6month. The main outcome was agreement with expert-reference for pre-therapy and post-therapy evaluation, the other outcome was accuracy with pathology for post-therapy evaluation. Results: After 6 months of training, targeted training group showed statistically higher agreement with expert-reference than non-targeted training group for both pre-therapy and post-therapy MRI EMVI evaluation of testing case A and testing case B, all p < 0.05. Targeted training group also showed significantly higher accuracy with pathology than non-targeted training group for post-therapy evaluation of testing case A and testing case B after 6 months of training, all p < 0.05. Conclusion: The diagnostic performance for MRI EMVI evaluation could be promoted by targeted training for inexperienced radiologist. Advances in knowledge: This study provided the first evidence that after 6month targeted training, inexperienced radiologists demonstrated improved diagnostic performance, with a 20% increase in agreement with expert-reference for both pre-therapy and post-therapy MRI EMVI evaluation and also a 20% increase in or accuracy with pathology for post-therapy evaluation, while inexperienced radiologists could not gain obvious improvement in MRI EMVI evaluation through the same period of regular clinical practice. It indicated that targeted training may be necessary for helping inexperienced radiologist to acquire adequate experience for the MRI EMVI evaluation of rectal cancer, especially for radiologist who works in a medical unit where MRI EMVI diagnosis is uncommon.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?