Abstract:Cascading failure process in interdependent networks has always been an important field of network cascading analysis.Unlike the previous studies,we take people's demand for minimizing travel costs into consideration in this article and propose a network dynamics model based on the cost constraint.On this basis,we pay attention to the characteristics of different layers in the interdependent network,and taking the real-world traffic network for example,we define different load propagation modes for different layers.Then,we carry out the simulation experiment on cascade failure in the artificial network.By changing the structure of the network and the parameters in the model,such as the capability value of the network side and the connectivity of the network,we are able to focus on the effects of traditional protection strategies during the simulation and obtain some interesting conclusions.It is generally believed that increasing the quantity of connections in the network or improving the quality of edges will enhance the network robustness effectively.However,our experimental results show that these methods may actually reduce network robustness in some cases.On the one hand,we find that the resurrection of some special edges in the network is the main reason for the capacity paradox,as these edges will destroy the stable structure of the original network.On the other hand,neither improving the internal connectivity of a single-layer network nor enhancing the coupling strength between interdependent networks will effectively improve network robustness.This is because as the number of edges increases,some critical edges may appear in the network,attracting a large amount of the network load and leading the network robustness to decrease.These conclusions remind us that blindly investing resources in network construction cannot achieve the best protection effect.Only by scientifically designing the network structures and allocating network resources reasonably can the network robustness be effectively improved.

Robustness of Complex Networks: Cascading Failure Mechanism by Considering the Characteristics of Time Delay and Recovery Strategy

Robustness of Complex Networks with an Improved Breakdown Probability Against Cascading Failures

A Model for Cascading Failures in Complex Networks with A Tunable Parameter

Recovery Strategy of Multilayer Network Against Cascading Failure

Robustness of Interdependent Networks with Different Link Patterns Against Cascading Failures

Robustness analysis of the networks in cascading failures with controllable parameters

Enhancing The Robustness Of Complex Networks Against Edge-Based-Attack Cascading Failures

Cascading Failure Model and Resilience-Based Sequential Recovery Strategy for Complex Networks

Cascading Failure in Networks with Dynamical Behavior Against Multi-Node Removal

Cascading Failure in Multilayer Network with Asymmetric Dependence Group

Robustness Paradox of Cascading Dynamics in Interdependent Networks

Analysis of Cascading Dynamics in Complex Networks with an Emergency Recovery Mechanism

Cascading Failures on Complex Networks Based on the Local Preferential Redistribution Rule of the Load

Universal Cascading Failures on Complex Networks Based on Attacks

Robustness of Scale-Free Networks with Dynamical Behavior Against Multi-Node Perturbation

Cascading Failure in Multilayer Networks with Dynamic Dependency Groups

A Model for Cascading Failures in Scale-Free Networks with a Breakdown Probability

Robustness and Vulnerability of Networks with Dynamical Dependency Groups

Robustness of complex networks with the local protection strategy against cascading failures

Robustness Paradox of Attack Behavior Induced by Cascading Failures: the Larger the Attack, the More Vulnerable the Network?

Attack Robustness of Cascading Load Model in Interdependent Networks