Abstract:Groundwater contamination source identification (GCSI) is a prerequisite for contamination risk evaluation and efficient groundwater contamination remediation programs. The boundary condition generally is set as known variables in previous GCSI studies. However, in many practical cases, the boundary condition is complicated and cannot be estimated accurately in advance. Setting the boundary condition as known variables may seriously deviate from the actual situation and lead to distorted identification results. And the results of GCSI are affected by multiple factors, including contaminant source information, model parameters, boundary condition, etc. Therefore, if the boundary condition is not estimated accurately, other factors will also be estimated inaccurately. This study focuses on the unknown boundary condition and proposed to identify three types of unknown variables (contaminant source information, model parameters and boundary condition) innovatively. When simulation-optimization (S-O) method is applied to GCSI, the huge computational load is usually reduced by building surrogate models. However, when building surrogate models, the researchers need to select the models and optimize the hyperparameters to make the model powerful, which can be a lengthy process. The automated machine learning (AutoML) method was used to build surrogate model, which automates the model selection and hyperparameter optimization in machine learning engineering, largely reducing human operations and saving time. The accuracy of AutoML surrogate model is compared with the surrogate model used in eXtreme Gradient Boosting method (XGBoost), random forest method (RF), extra trees regressor method (ETR) and elasticnet method (EN) respectively, which are automatically selected in AutoML engineering. The results show that the surrogate model constructed by AutoML method has the best accuracy compared with the other four methods. This study provides reliable and strong support for GCSI.(c) 2023 China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China University of Geosciences (Beijing). This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Identification of Transient Contaminant Sources in Aquifers Through a Surrogate Model Based on a Modified Self-Organizing-maps Algorithm

Simultaneous identification of contaminant sources and hydraulic conductivity field by combining geostatistics method with self-organizing maps algorithm

Two-stage Surrogate Model-Assisted Bayesian Framework for Groundwater Contaminant Source Identification

Surrogate Model-Based Simulation-Optimization Approach for Groundwater Source Identification Problems

Identifying groundwater contaminant sources based on a KELM surrogate model together with four heuristic optimization algorithms

Sensitivity-dependent dynamic searching approach coupling multi-intelligent surrogates in homotopy mechanism for groundwater DNAPL-source inversion

Application of Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Optimization Programming Based on Ensemble Surrogate Model for Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Source Identification in Groundwater

Heuristic Search Strategy Based on Probabilistic and Geostatistical Simulation Approach for Simultaneous Identification of Groundwater Contaminant Source and Simulation Model Parameters

Hydrogeochemical analysis and groundwater pollution source identification based on self-organizing map at a contaminated site

Inverse estimation of multiple contaminant sources in three-dimensional heterogeneous aquifers with variable-density flows

A Comparison of Inversion Methods for Surrogate‐Based Groundwater Contamination Source Identification With Varying Degrees of Model Complexity

Characterizing Multi-Source Heavy Metal Contaminated Sites at the Hun River Basin: an Integrated Deep Learning and Data Assimilation Approach

Groundwater Contaminant Source Identification Considering Unknown Boundary Condition Based on an Automated Machine Learning Surrogate

Optimization of Well Position and Sampling Frequency for Groundwater Monitoring and Inverse Identification of Contamination Source Conditions Using Bayes’ Theorem

Comparative Study of Surrogate Models for Groundwater Contamination Source Identification at DNAPL-contaminated Sites

Simultaneous identification of unknown groundwater pollution sources and estimation of aquifer parameters

Homotopy-based Hyper-Heuristic Searching Approach for Reciprocal Feedback Inversion of Groundwater Contamination Source and Aquifer Parameters

Groundwater Contamination Source Identification Based on Sobol Sequences–based Sparrow Search Algorithm with a BiLSTM Surrogate Model

An Improved Bayesian Approach Linked to a Surrogate Model for Identifying Groundwater Pollution Sources

Review of machine learning-based surrogate models of groundwater contaminant modeling

Identification of unknown groundwater pollution sources using classical optimization with linked simulation