Animal Diversity Responding to Different Forest Restoration Schemes in the Qinling Mountains, China

Yuke Zhang,Xuehua Liu,Zixin Lv,Xiangyu Zhao,Xingzhong Yang,Xiaodong Jia,Wanlong Sun,Xiangbo He,Baishuo He,Qiong Cai,Yun Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.05.020
IF: 3.8
2019-01-01
Ecological Engineering
Abstract:China's primary forest has gone through the extensive deforestation and further restoration since 1950s. However, little is known about how animal diversity responds to restoration. Here, we used camera trapping to monitor diversity of large-and-medium mammals for three years (2014-2017) in four forest habitat types in the Qinling Mountains: high-elevation primary forest, low-elevation primary forest, secondary forest, and plantation forest. The species richness did not vary between forest types (n = 17-18). But the relative abundant index (RAI) was higher in low-elevation primary (3.00%), followed by plantation forest (1.77%), secondary forest (0.89%), and high-elevation primary forest (0.74%), respectively. In term of habitat using, low-elevation primary forest was the most preferred habitat by the animals (11 species), followed by high-elevation forest (5 species), and plantation forest (4 species), while secondary forest was only preferred by 1 species. Species' preferences on forest habitat types were stable during daytime and night-time but significantly changed in different seasons. Our study indicated that both plantation forest and secondary forest in the Qinling Mountains played important roles of supporting animal species. Thus a comprehensive management is required for biodiversity conservation in the Qinling Mountains.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?