Abstract:The potentially serious economic consequences of China’s severe air pollution problem cannot be overlooked, especially the impact on corporate innovation, which is a core driver guiding firms towards efficient and high-quality development. However, the existing literature has more often investigated the effect of pollution on corporate innovation from the perspective of environmental regulation, while relatively little research is available directly from the perspective of air pollution. In this study, for better causal identification and endogeneity treatment, we consider the Qin ling Mountains-Huai River heating policy as a quasi-natural experiment and explore for the first time the causal effect of air pollution on Chinese industrial firms’ innovation through a geographical regression discontinuity (RD) approach. The results find that air pollution has a significant inhibitory effect on the industrial firms’ innovation, especially for green innovation, where the innovation of state-owned enterprises, high pollution, and low monopoly firms are more sensitive to pollution. Specifically, a 1% increase in PM2.5 emissions leads to a 0.803% reduction in the corporate total innovation, a 0.924% reduction in invention patents, a 0.574% reduction in utility model patents, and a 1.087% reduction in design patents. We have verified the robustness of this core finding through a series of robustness checks including adjustment bandwidth, IV estimation, and placebo test. Further to this, we find that air pollution may negatively affect corporate innovation through three channels: crowding out R&D investment, reducing total factor productivity (TFP), and reducing labor supply and the proportion of highly skilled employees. This study sheds light on the severe losses caused by air pollution on corporate innovation capabilities at the micro-level, deepening the understanding of the economic harm caused by air pollution. This suggests that as firms strive to improve their innovative capacity and competitiveness, they should also be aware of environmental protection and green development; otherwise, unnecessary losses in innovation dynamics will be incurred.Graphical abstract

Does the Political Promotion of Local Officials Impede Corporate Innovation?

Political Promotion Incentives and Within-Firm Pay Gap: Evidence from China

Promotion Incentive: Corruption and Its Implications on Local Fiscal Cycles in China

Do Political Ties Facilitate or Inhibit Firm Innovation in China? an Examination of the Institutional Structure

Political Incentives and Local Policy Innovations in China

Do political incentives promote or inhibit corporate social responsibility? The role of local officials' tenure

Does local green governance promote corporate green innovation? A new perspective from green officials

How does political ambition affect carbon emission intensity in China?

The impact of political competition on low-carbon technology innovation: From the perspective of officials’ personal characteristics

Air pollution and corporate innovation: incentive or resistance? Evidence from regression discontinuity

Promotion Incentive: Corruption and Its Implications on Political Budget Cycles in China

Do Environmental Regulations Promote or Inhibit Cities’ Innovation Capacity? Evidence from China

Auditing the Leader: The Impact of Targeting Local Officials' Environmental Regulations on Innovation

Strategic Interaction in Political Competition: Evidence from Spatial Effects Across Chinese Cities

Political Turnover and Innovation: Evidence from China

Environmental fees, local competition, and corporate green innovation activities: evidence from China

How Promotion Incentives and Environmental Regulations Affect China’s Environmental Pollution?

Political connections and green technology innovations under an environmental regulation

Anti-corruption and firm innovation: political path dependence perspective

The Dark Side of Political Promotion Incentives: Evidence from Firm Performance

Does the political promotion incentive of state-owned enterprise executives facilitate green innovation?