Tetraquark Interpretation of the Charged Bottomonium-Like Stateszb±(10610)andzb±
Ahmed Ali,Christian Hambrock,Wei Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.85.054011
2012-01-01
Abstract:We present a tetraquark interpretation of the charged bottomonium-like states ${Z}_{b}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}(10610)$ and ${Z}_{b}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}(10650)$, observed by the Belle collaboration in the ${\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}\ensuremath{\Upsilon}(nS)$ $(n=1,2,3)$ and ${\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}{h}_{b}(mP)$ $m=1$, 2) invariant mass spectra from the data taken near the peak of the $\ensuremath{\Upsilon}(5S)$. In this framework, the underlying processes involve the production and decays of a vector tetraquark ${Y}_{b}(10890)$, ${e}^{+}{e}^{\ensuremath{-}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{Y}_{b}(10890)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}[{Z}_{b}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}(10610){\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{\mp}},{Z}_{b}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}(10650){\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{\mp}}]$ followed by the decays $[{Z}_{b}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}(10610),{Z}_{b}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}(10650)]\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}\ensuremath{\Upsilon}(nS),{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}{h}_{b}(mP)$. Combining the contributions from the meson loops and an effective Hamiltonian, we are able to reproduce the observed masses of the ${Z}_{b}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}(10610)$ and ${Z}_{b}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}(10650)$. The analysis presented here is in agreement with the Belle data and provides crucial tests of the tetraquark hypothesis. We also calculate the corresponding meson-loop effects in the charm sector and find them dynamically suppressed. The charged charmonium-like states ${Z}_{c}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}(3752)$ and ${Z}_{c}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}(3882)$ can be searched for in the decays of the ${J}^{PC}={1}^{--}$ tetraquark state $Y(4260)$ via $Y(4260)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{Z}_{c}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}(3752){\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{\mp}}$ and $Y(4260)\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{Z}_{c}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}(3882){\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{\mp}}$, with the subsequent decays $({Z}_{c}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}(3752),{Z}_{c}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}(3882))\ensuremath{\rightarrow}(J/\ensuremath{\psi},{h}_{c}){\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}}$.