Fe-doping Induced Suppression of the Second Magnetic Transition in Sr4Ru3O10

Yan Liu,Weiwei Chu,Yu Wang,Jiyong Yang,Haifeng Du,Wei Ning,Zhe Qu,Peigang Li,Zhuan Xu,Zhiqiang Mao,Mingliang Tian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.99.214418
IF: 3.7
2019-01-01
Physical Review B
Abstract:Ruthenium oxide ($\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{r}}_{4}\mathrm{R}{\mathrm{u}}_{3}{\mathrm{O}}_{10}$) exhibits a second magnetic transition at a temperature ${T}_{M}$ below its ferromagnetic (FM) transition (${T}_{C}\ensuremath{\sim}105$ K), which has attracted considerable attention in the past two decades. Here, we successfully grew $\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{r}}_{4}{(\mathrm{R}{\mathrm{u}}_{1\ensuremath{-}x}\mathrm{F}{\mathrm{e}}_{x})}_{3}{\mathrm{O}}_{10}$ ($x=0.01$) crystal and systematically investigated the magnetotransport property of its nanosheets. We found a feature that there is an in-plane FM order aligned along ⟨110⟩ directions below ${T}_{C}$ without the occurrence of the second magnetic transition at ${T}_{M}$, which is in contrast to that expected in pure $\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{r}}_{4}\mathrm{R}{\mathrm{u}}_{3}{\mathrm{O}}_{10}$ nanosheets, where the in-plane FM order will rotate to the $c$ direction below ${T}_{M}$. Furthermore, a metamagnetic-like transition is also observed below \ensuremath{\sim}50 K at about 2 T when the magnetic field is applied along the $c$ axis. These results unambiguously demonstrate that the second magnetic transition at ${T}_{M}$ is actually a consequence of spin reorientation induced by the inherent coupling between the spin and lattice, which can be effectively tuned by element doping.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?