Cigarette Smoke‐Induced Myocardial Inflammation and Contractile Dysfunction is Mediated by Unsaturated Aldehydes and TRPV1

Emily Y. He,Zhenbiao Wu,Glenda I. Scott,Jun Ren
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.27.1_supplement.1086.15
2013-01-01
Abstract:Cigarette smoking triggers proinflammatory response through stimulating the capsaicin‐sensitive transient receptor potential cation channel TRPV1. Recent evidence suggests that smoking is associated with an overtly increased prevalence of heart diseases. This study was designed to examine the effect of 2 α,β‐unsaturated aldehydes present in cigarette smoke, namely crotonaldehyde and acrolein, on myocardial insulin sensitivity and contractile function. Our results revealed that in vitro short‐term exposure of crotonaldehyde, and acrolein provoked myocardial inflammatory response and dampened insulin signaling manifested as accumulation of the cytokines TNF‐α and NFκB as well as reduced insulin‐stimulated glucose uptake. These responses were accompanied with compromised cardiomyocyte contractile function including depressed peak cardiomyocyte contractile capacity, prolonged duration of relaxation, decreased intracellular Ca2+ release and slowed intracellular Ca2+ clearing. Activation of TRPV1 was enhanced in response to aldehyde exposure. Interestingly, the crotonaldehyde and acrolein‐induced pro‐inflammatory response, loss of insulin sensitivity and cardiomyocyte contractile function were significantly attenuated or mitigated by the aldehyde scavenger glutathione and the TRPV1 antagonist capsazepine. Both aldehydes and capsaicin increased the activity of Nox3 NADPH oxidase activity and STAT1. Inhibition of Nox3 and STAT1 independently blunt the crotonaldehyde and acrolein‐induced cardiomyocyte dysfunction. Inhibition of TRPV1 protected against the aldehyde cytotoxicity. Taken together, our data suggest a role of α,β‐unsaturated aldehydes as the main causative agents in cigarette smoke in the pathogenesis of cigarette smoke‐induced heart diseases possibly via a Nox3/STAT1‐ and TRPV1‐dependent mechanism.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?