Abstract:In this paper, a sparse learning algorithm, probabilistic classification vector machines (PCVMs), is proposed. We analyze relevance vector machines (RVMs) for classification problems and observe that adopting the same prior for different classes may lead to unstable solutions. In order to tackle this problem, a signed and truncated Gaussian prior is adopted over every weight in PCVMs, where the sign of prior is determined by the class label, i.e., +1 or -1. The truncated Gaussian prior not only restricts the sign of weights but also leads to a sparse estimation of weight vectors, and thus controls the complexity of the model. In PCVMs, the kernel parameters can be optimized simultaneously within the training algorithm. The performance of PCVMs is extensively evaluated on four synthetic data sets and 13 benchmark data sets using three performance metrics, error rate (ERR), area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic (AUC), and root mean squared error (RMSE). We compare PCVMs with soft-margin support vector machines (SVM(Soft)), hard-margin support vector machines (SVM(Hard)), SVM with the kernel parameters optimized by PCVMs (SVM(PCVM)), relevance vector machines (RVMs), and some other baseline classifiers. Through five replications of twofold cross-validation F test, i.e., 5 x 2 cross-validation F test, over single data sets and Friedman test with the corresponding post-hoc test to compare these algorithms over multiple data sets, we notice that PCVMs outperform other algorithms, including SVM(Soft), SVM(Hard), RVM, and SVM(PCVM), on most of the data sets under the three metrics, especially under AUC. Our results also reveal that the performance of SVM(PCVM) is slightly better than SVM(Soft), implying that the parameter optimization algorithm in PCVMs is better than cross validation in terms of performance and computational complexity. In this paper, we also discuss the superiority of PCVMs' formulation using maximum a posteriori (MAP) analysis and margin analysis, which explain the empirical success of PCVMs.

Feature Selection Based on Sparse Bayesian Model

Sparse Bayesian Approach for Feature Selection

Probabilistic Feature Selection and Classification Vector Machine

Bayesian Classifier for Sparsity-Promoting Feature Selection

Efficient Probabilistic Classification Vector Machine with Incremental Basis Function Selection.

Probabilistic Classification Vector Machines.

Feature Selection Based on Sparse Imputation.

Structured Sparse Model Based Feature Selection and Classification for Hyperspectral Imagery

A Feature Selection Method Based on Feature Grouping and Genetic Algorithm

Learning Feature Sparse Principal Components

A Convex Sparse PCA for Feature Analysis.

Sparse Support Vector Machine with L P Penalty for Feature Selection

Learning Feature Sparse Principal Subspace.

Sparse Kernel Feature Extraction Via Support Vector Learning.

Convex Sparse PCA for Unsupervised Feature Learning.

Feature Selection Algorithm Based on Sparse Score and Correlation Analysis

Feature Selection Using Sparse Twin Bounded Support Vector Machine.

Fast Sparse PCA via Positive Semidefinite Projection for Unsupervised Feature Selection

Effective Feature Selection Using Feature Vector Graph for Classification

Feature selection for least squares projection twin support vector machine

An Implementation of FBCSP Replacing Feature Selection Method According to the Classifier