Abstract:One popular approach to prediction of binding motifs of transcription factors is to model the problem as to search for a group of l-mers (motifs), for some l > 0, one from each of the provided promoter regions of a group of co-expressed genes, that exhibit high information content when aligned without gaps. In our current work, we assume that these desired l-mers have evolved from a common ancestor, each of which has mutations in at most k-positions from the common ancestor, where k is substantially smaller than l. This implies that these l-mers should belong to the k-neighborhood of their common ancestor, measured in terms of Hamming distance. If the ancestor is given, then the problem for finding these l-mers becomes trivial. Unfortunately, the problem of identifying the unknown ancestor is probably as hard as the problem of predicting the motifs themselves. Our goal is to identify a set of l-mers that slightly violate the k-neighborhood of a putative ancestor, but capture all the desired motifs, which will lead to an efficient way for identification of the desired motifs. The main contributions of this paper are in four aspects: (a) we have derived nontrivial lower and upper bounds of information content for a set of l-mers that differ from an unknown ancestor in no more than k positions; (b) we have defined a new distance between two sequences and a k-pseudo-neighborhood, based on the new distance, that contains the k-neighborhood, defined by Hamming distance, of the to-be-defined ancestor; (c) we have developed an algorithm to minimize the sum of all the distances between a predicted ancestor motif and a group of l-mers from the provided promoter regions, using the new distance; and (d) we have tested PROMOCO and compared its prediction results performance with two other prediction programs. The algorithm, implemented as a computer software program PROMOCO, has been used to find all conserved motifs in a set of provided promoter sequences. Our preliminary application of PROMOCO shows that it achieves better or comparable prediction results, when compared to popular programs for identification of cis regulatory binding motifs. A limitation of the algorithm is that it does not work well when the size of the set of provided promoter sequences is too small or when desired motifs appear in only small portion of the given sequences.

Multi-motif Identification Using Differential Information Content and Cluster Refine

Identification of degenerate motifs using position restricted selection and hybrid ranking combination.

Detection of Over-Represented Motifs Corresponding to Known TFBSs Via Motif Clustering and Matching.

Detection of Transcription Factor Binding Sites via Motif Clustering and Matching

An Improved Gibbs Sampling Method for Motif Finding

Fdrmotif: Identifying Cis-Elements by an EM Algorithm Coupled with False Discovery Rate Control.

An effective algorithm of motif finding problem.

MotifHub: Detection of trans-acting DNA motif group with probabilistic modeling algorithm

DNA Sequences Motif Discovery Based on DFD Clustering

A New Exhaustive Method and Strategy for Finding Motifs in ChIP-enriched Regions.

PREDICTION OF <i>cis</i>-REGULATORY ELEMENTS: FROM HIGH-INFORMATION CONTENT ANALYSIS TO MOTIF IDENTIFICATION

PREDICTION OF Cis-Regulatory ELEMENTS: FROM HIGH-INFORMATION CONTENT ANALYSIS TO MOTIF IDENTIFICATION

GSMC: Combining Parallel Gibbs Sampling with Maximal Cliques for Hunting DNA Motif

Optimization of MISCORE-Based Motif Identification Systems

A Probability Based Similarity Scoring For Dna Motifs Comparison

Optimized Mixed Markov Models for Motif Identification

Computational Discovery of Motifs Using Hierarchical Clustering Techniques

Miscore: Mismatch-Based Matrix Similarity Scores For Dna Motif Detection

SOMEA: Self-Organizing Map Based Extraction Algorithm for DNA Motif Identification with Heterogeneous Model

Identification of DNA motif pairs on paired sequences based on composite heterogeneous graph

A Two-Block Motif Discovery Method With Improved Accuracy