Comparison of Carotid Plaque Characteristics Between Men and Women Using Magnetic Resonance Vessel Wall Imaging: A Chinese Atherosclerosis Risk Evaluation Study.
Lichen Zhang,Lina Zhu,Mingming Lu,Xihai Zhao,Feiyu Li,Jianming Cai,Chun Yuan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27576
IF: 4.4
2021-01-01
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:BackgroundCarotid vulnerable plaque is a major cause of stroke and differs between men and women. Few studies have investigated the differences in carotid plaque features between sexes in a Chinese population.PurposeTo compare carotid atherosclerotic plaque features between men and women in a Chinese population using magnetic resonance imaging.Study typeCross‐sectional.SubjectsA total of 567 patients (mean age: 61.5 ± 10.1 years; 404 men) who had recent stroke or transient ischemia attack and atherosclerotic plaque in at least one carotid artery.Field strengthA 3.0 T.SequenceT1‐ and T2‐weighted turbo spin echo, three‐dimensional time‐of‐flight (TOF) fast field echo and magnetization‐prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo sequences.AssessmentPlaque characteristics including lumen area (LA), wall area (WA), total vessel area (TVA), mean wall thickness (MWT), and mean normalized wall index (NWI); presence of calcification, lipid‐rich necrotic core (LRNC), intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), and fibrous cap rupture (FCR); and percent composition area (%area) were evaluated and compared between men and women.Statistical testsIndependent‐sample t test, Mann–Whitney U test, chi‐square test, and multiple linear and logistic regressions.ResultsIn symptomatic arteries, men had significantly greater LA (46.2 ± 15.6 mm2 vs. 40.7 ± 12.9 mm2, P < 0.05), WA (33.9 ± 11.5 mm2 vs. 26.3 ± 7.5 mm2, P < 0.05), and TVA (80.1 ± 20.4 mm2 vs. 67.0 ± 18.0 mm2, P < 0.05); higher MWT (1.2 ± 0.4 mm vs. 1.0 ± 0.2 mm, P < 0.05); and higher prevalence of LRNC (72.3% vs. 46.0%, P < 0.05) and IPH (18.6% vs. 4.9%, P < 0.05) compared with women. In asymptomatic arteries, men had significantly greater LA (48.3 ± 16.9 mm2 vs. 42.1 ± 12.6 mm2, P < 0.05), WA (32.9 ± 11.0 mm2 vs. 25.8 ± 6.1 mm2, P < 0.05), and TVA (81.2 ± 22.1 mm2 vs. 67.9 ± 16.5 mm2, P < 0.05); higher MWT (1.2 ± 0.3 mm vs. 1.0 ± 0.2 mm, P < 0.05); higher prevalence of LRNC (67.8% vs. 42.9%, P < 0.05), IPH (14.9% vs. 1.2%, P < 0.05), and FCR (6.4% vs. 1.2%, P < 0.05); and higher %LRNC area (24.8 ± 17.2% vs. 17.8 ± 14.1%, P < 0.05) compared with women.Data conclusionMen have similar plaque burden but more vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques compared with women in both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid arteries in a Chinese population.Evidence Level4Technical EfficacyStage 3