Abstract:The genomic evaluation process relies on the assumption of linkage disequilibrium between dense single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers at the genome level and quantitative trait loci (QTL). The present study was conducted with the aim of evaluating four frequentist methods including Ridge Regression, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Elastic Net, and Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP) and five Bayesian methods including Bayes Ridge Regression (BRR), Bayes A, Bayesian LASSO, Bayes C, and Bayes B, in genomic selection using simulation data. The difference between prediction accuracy was assessed in pairs based on statistical significance (p-value) (i.e., t test and Mann-Whitney U test) and practical significance (Cohen's d effect size) For this purpose, the data were simulated based on two scenarios in different marker densities (4000 and 8000, in the whole genome). The simulated data included a genome with four chromosomes, 1 Morgan each, on which 100 randomly distributed QTL and two different densities of evenly distributed SNPs (1000 and 2000), at the heritability level of 0.4, was considered. For the frequentist methods except for GBLUP, the regularization parameter λ was calculated using a five-fold cross-validation approach. For both scenarios, among the frequentist methods, the highest prediction accuracy was observed by Ridge Regression and GBLUP. The lowest and the highest bias were shown by Ridge Regression and GBLUP, respectively. Also, among the Bayesian methods, Bayes B and BRR showed the highest and lowest prediction accuracy, respectively. The lowest bias in both scenarios was registered by Bayesian LASSO and the highest bias in the first and the second scenario were shown by BRR and Bayes B, respectively. Across all the studied methods in both scenarios, the highest and the lowest accuracy were shown by Bayes B and LASSO and Elastic Net, respectively. As expected, the greatest similarity in performance was observed between GBLUP and BRR ( d = 0.007 , in the first scenario and d = 0.003 , in the second scenario). The results obtained from parametric t and non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests were similar. In the first and second scenario, out of 36 t test between the performance of the studied methods in each scenario, 14 ( P < . 001 ) and 2 ( P < . 05 ) comparisons were significant, respectively, which indicates that with the increase in the number of predictors, the difference in the performance of different methods decreases. This was proven based on the Cohen's d effect size, so that with the increase in the complexity of the model, the effect size was not seen as very large. The regularization parameters in frequentist methods should be optimized by cross-validation approach before using these methods in genomic evaluation.

Confidence intervals for validation statistics with data truncation in genomic prediction

Pitfalls and Remedies for Cross Validation with Multi-trait Genomic Prediction Methods

Impact of truncating historical data on prediction ability of dairy sheep selection candidates

Boundaries for genotype, phenotype, and pedigree truncation in genomic evaluations in pigs

Overview of model validation for survival regression model with competing risks using melanoma study data

Testing for an ignorable sampling bias under random double truncation

Comparison of Selective Genotyping Strategies for Prediction of Breeding Values in A Population Undergoing Selection

Prediction of Complex Human Traits Using the Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor

Using Genetic Distance to Infer the Accuracy of Genomic Prediction

Use of the linear regression method to evaluate population accuracy of predictions from non-linear models

A marker weighting approach for enhancing within-family accuracy in genomic prediction

Investigating the Performance of Frequentist and Bayesian Techniques in Genomic Evaluation

Effect of training-sample size and classification difficulty on the accuracy of genomic predictors

Genomic Prediction and Validation Strategies for Reproductive Traits in Holstein Cattle Across Different Chinese Regions and Climatic Conditions

Efficient strategies for leave-one-out cross validation for genomic best linear unbiased prediction

Impact of selective genotyping in the training population on accuracy and bias of genomic selection

Comparing algorithms to approximate accuracies for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor

Incorporating the Single-Step Strategy into a Random Regression Model to Enhance Genomic Prediction of Longitudinal Traits.

Regularized quantile regression applied to genome-enabled prediction of quantitative traits

A Penalized Regression Method for Genomic Prediction Reduces Mismatch between Training and Testing Sets

Genomic Prediction Enhanced Sparse Testing for Multi-environment Trials