Factors Associated with the Decision for Operative Versus Conservative Treatment of Displaced Distal Radius Fractures in the Elderly

Yao-Sen Wu,Jie Yang,Lin-Zhen Xie,Jia-Yu Zhang,Xian-Bin Yu,Wei Hu,Hua Chen,Liao-Jun Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.15395
2019-01-01
Abstract:Background The treatment of senile distal radius fractures had not been clearly defined. The objective of this study was to identify the factors associated with the decision for operative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in patients aged over 55 years. Methods Data of 318 patients with displaced distal radius fractures were collected on patient-, fracture- and surgeon-related characteristics that were plausibly related to the decision for operation. Mean comparisons or chi-squared test were used for univariate analysis of the above-mentioned factors, and then multiple logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the decision for operation. Results Univariate analysis showed that age, osteoporosis, Charlson score, associated orthopaedic injuries requiring surgery, Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO) and Fernandez classification, radial height, volar tilt, volar/dorsal comminution, ulnar variance, intra-articular displacement/step-off, associated distal radioulnar joint instability or radiocarpal joint dislocation and subspecialty of treating surgeons had statistically significant association with operative intervention. In the multivariate analysis, the predictors of operative intervention were younger patient age (P = 0.028), associated orthopaedic injuries requiring surgery (P = 0.020), higher AO classification (P = 0.037), higher Fernandez classification (P = 0.041), radial shortening >5 mm (P = 0.020), volar tilt > -10 degrees (P = 0.020), volar/dorsal comminution (P = 0.020), ulnar variance >5 mm (P = 0.023), intra-articular displacement/step-off >2 mm (P = 0.004), associated distal radioulnar joint instability or radiocarpal joint dislocation (P = 0.047) and treatment by an upper extremity specialist (P = 0.038). Conclusion The decision for surgery was predominantly influenced by the characteristics and severity of the fracture. Patients' age and treatment by an upper extremity specialist were also significant factors associated with a higher likelihood of operative intervention.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?