Abstract:While ex-ante evaluations of climate mitigation policies predict that co-benefits of improved air quality will enable the aggregate benefits of climate mitigation policies to outweigh their costs, there is little empirical evidence to support this assertion. In this study, we use data on weekly smokestack emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) from firms participating in Shanghai's carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions trading scheme (ETS) to deliver one of the first ex-post evaluations on the co-benefits of China's ETS. Using a panel-regression model in which all firms' characteristics and seasonal effects are controlled, we find a significant negative association between CO2 emissions prices and industrial SO2 emissions (elasticity of -0.13). A closer examination reveals that most of these effects were driven by specific sectors (iron and steel) and during months in which firms were required to balance their annual CO2 emissions. To ensure our results are not driven by confounding factors and our model's assumptions, we conducted several falsification checks using SO2 emissions from non-ETS firms and firms from a nearby city, using various model specifications. Our findings suggest that co-benefits from climate mitigation policies should not be taken for granted, and that policy designs and types of sector sources of emissions are important determinants of co-benefits. Key policy insights The study provides empirical evidence for air pollution co-benefits of a CO2 ETS using weekly smokestack-level data from Shanghai, China Evidence from the Shanghai ETS shows that a 1% increase in CO2 prices in Shanghai is associated with a 0.13% decrease in SO2 emissions These co-benefits, however, are limited to specific sectors (e.g. ferrous metals), and are not found in other major CO2 emitting sources or sectors (e.g. power utilities) The relationship between CO2 prices and co-benefits is also stronger during months in which firms are required to balance their annual CO2 emissions using permits

Environmental co-benefits of climate mitigation: Evidence from clean development mechanism projects in China

Co-benefits and Additionality of the Clean Development Mechanism: an Empirical Analysis

Effect of Carbon Market on Air Pollution: Firm-level Evidence in China

The impact and mechanism analysis of Clean Development Mechanism on the synergistic effects of pollution mitigation and carbon reduction

Co-benefits of CO<sub>2</sub> emission reduction from China's clean air actions between 2013-2020

Pursuing Air Pollutant Co-Benefits of CO2 Mitigation in China: A Provincial Leveled Analysis

Co-benefits from energy policies in China

Co-Benefits of Co2 and Pm2.5 Emission Reduction

Analysis of the Co-Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation and Air Pollution Reduction in China

Effect of the Carbon Emissions Trading Policy on the Co-Benefits of Carbon Emissions Reduction and Air Pollution Control

Clean Development, Energy Substitution, and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Project Implementation in China

Improving the regional deployment of carbon mitigation efforts by incorporating air-quality co-benefits: A multi-provincial analysis of China

The Clean Development Mechanism and Corporate Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from China

Air quality and health co-benefits of China's national emission trading system

Do CO2 Emissions Trading Schemes Deliver Co-Benefits? Evidence from Shanghai

Mutual effects of CO2 emission reduction and air pollution control policies in beijing-tianjin-hebei region

Optimizing air quality and health Co-benefits of mitigation technologies in China: An integrated assessment

Co-benefits of Policies to Reduce Air Pollution and Carbon Emissions in China

Health and Economic Benefit of China’s Greenhouse Gas Mitigation by 2050

Co-benefits of Deep Carbon Reduction on Air Quality and Health Improvement in Sichuan Province of China

Co-Benefits of China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme: Impact Mechanism and Spillover Effect