Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To observe the efficacy and complications of one-stage tumor resection to treat primary sacral neurogenic tumors and to discuss some details in the clinically relevant anatomy.METHODS:A retrospective analysis of 26 patients with neurogenic turors of the sacral spine who were surgically treated from January 2001 to January 2018, including 16 males and 10 females, aged from 21 to 69 years old with an average age of (39.3±10.9) years old. The courses of diseases ranged from 3 to 56 months with an average of (17.9±10.1) months. The diameters of presacral components ranged from 3.3 to 19.6 cm with an average of (8.7±4.1) cm. The proximal margin of presacral lesions was above the L5S1 level in 6 cases, and lower than L5S1 in 20 cases. A posterior incision approach for one-stage complete resection of the tumor was used firstly, and an anterior approach was combined when necessary. Spinal-pelvic reconstruction with the modified Galveston technique was also carried out in relevant cases. Whether to preserve the tumor-involved nerve roots depended on the situation during the operation. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, pain relief, and complications were recorded. The lumbosacral spine stability and sacral plexus neurological function were evaluated during postoperative follow-up, and local recurrence and distant metastasis were examined as well.RESULTS:Total excision was achieved in all 26 patients, with an operation time of (160.4±35.3) mins and an intraoperative blood loss of (1 092.3±568.8) ml. Tumors have been removed via a posterior-only approach in 21 cases and via combined anterior/posterior approaches in 5 cases. The diameter of presacral masses components ranged from 11.3 to 19.6 cm with an average of (15.1±3.2) cm in patients with combined anterior/posterior approaches, and ranged from 3.3 to 10.9 cm with an average of (7.2±2.4) cm in patients with a posterior-only approach. Five of the six patients whose proximal margin of presacral masses was above the L5S1 level adopted combined anterior/posterior approaches, and 20 patients lower than the L5S1 level adopted the posterior-only approach. All the patients were followed up for 6 to 82 months with an average of(45.4±18.2)months. Postoperative lumbosacral pain and lower extremity radicular pain were significantly relieved, and sensation, muscle strength and bowel and bladder function were also improved to varying degrees. The postoperative early complications included superficial wound infection in 1 case and cerebrospinal fluid leakage in 2 cases. Pathology confirmed 17 cases of schwannoma, 7 cases of neurofibroma and 2 cases of malignant schwannoma. Local recurrence was observed in two cases of benign neurogenic tumors. One patient with a malignant nerve sheath tumor had lung metastasis, who died 20 months after the operation. In 17 cases of upper sacral neurogenic tumors, 4 cases did not undergo spinal-pelvic reconstruction with internal fixation, of which 2 cases suffered from postoperative segmental instability. Tumor-involved nerve roots were resected during surgery in 7 cases. One of these patients who had S2 and S3 nerve roots sacrificed simultaneously had an impaired bladder and bowel function postoperatively, and did not recover completely. In the other 6 cases, the neurological function was not damaged obviously or recovered well.CONCLUSION:The posterior approach can directly expose the lesions, and it is also convenient to deal with nerve roots and blood vessels. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, degree of symptom relief, complication rate, and recurrence and metastasis rate can be controlled at an appropriate level. It is a safe and effective surgical approach. When the upper edge of the presacral mass is higher than the L5S1 level or the diameter of the presacral mass exceeds 10 cm, an additional anterior approach should be considered. The stress between the spine and pelvis is high, and internal fixation should be used to restore the mechanical continuity of the spine and pelvis during resection of neurogenic tumors of the high sacral spine. Most of the parent nerve roots have lost their function. Resection of a single parent nerve root is unlikely to cause severe neurological dysfunction, while the adjacent nerve roots have compensatory functions and should be preserved as much as possible during surgery.

Surgical Treatment of Giant Benign Sacral Neurogenic Tumors Using the Posterior-Only Approach.

Pre-operative embolization facilitating a posterior approach for the surgical resection of giant sacral neurogenic tumors.

Single-stage En Bloc Resection Using a Posterior Approach for Sacral Tumors

Surgical Management of Sacral Neurogenic Tumors

Strategy of Surgical Treatment of Sacral Neurogenic Tumors

[The Surgical Management of Sacral Tumors].

Surgical treatment of primary sacral tumor

Is Total En Bloc Sacrectomy Using a Posterior-Only Approach Feasible and Safe for Patients with Malignant Sacral Tumors?

Outcome of Conservative Surgery for Giant Cell Tumor of the Sacrum

A retrospective analysis of surgical treatment for giant cell tumor in sacrum:a single-center study

Total sacrectomy with a combined antero-posterior surgical approach for malignant sacral tumours

Strategy of surgical treatment of the nerve sheath tumors involving the sacrum

Surgical Strategy and Application of Robotic-Assisted Benign Sacral Neurogenic Tumor Resection.

Giant sacral schwannoma: a report of six cases.

Technique And Surgical Outcome Of Total Resection Of Lower Sacral Tumor

Total sacrectomy for primary multilevel malignant sacral tumors

Treatment of giant invasive spine schwannoma via variant single surgical approach

Surgical Treatment of Giant Cell Tumors of the Sacrum and Spine Combined with Pre-Operative Transarterial Embolization

A case study using total en bloc sacrectomy and neuroanastomosis for sacral tumor

A classification system and surgical strategy for sacral tumora

Surgical Treatment of Sacral Primartumors after Transcatheter Arterial Embolization with gelfoam