Abstract:Background In patients with angina and no obstructive coronary disease (ANOCA), the underlying pathophysiology includes microvascular angina (endothelial-dependent and independent coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD)) and vasospastic angina (microvascular spasm and epicardial spasm) diagnosed with invasive coronary functional angiography (CFA). However, whether there are differences in demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes by underlying diagnosis is unknown. We hypothesize that microvascular angina patients will be older and have more cardiovascular risk factors and worse outcomes than the vasospastic angina group. Objective To explore the differences in demographics, risk factors, and outcomes in ANOCA patients with microvascular and vasospastic angina. Methods A prospective registry-based cohort study of consecutive CFA was performed in 156 ANOCA patients between 2020 and 2023 using the Doppler-tipped guide wire method. Patients were classified into microvascular angina, vasospastic angina, and mixed disease. Microvascular angina was defined as endothelial-independent CMD (coronary flow reserve [CFR] < 2.5 in response to adenosine) and/or endothelial-independent CMD (coronary blood flow [CBF] < 50% or no change in vessel diameter in response to 54 mcg intracoronary acetylcholine). Vasospastic angina as microvascular ( 90% constriction) to 108 mcg intracoronary acetylcholine. The mixed disease group included microvascular and vasospastic angina. Validated questionnaires evaluated angina (SAQ-7), functional capacity (DASI), dyspnea severity (UCSD SOB), and perceived stress (PSS) were obtained from patients at office visits prior to undergoing CFA. Results Among 156 ANOCA patients, 114 had microvascular angina, 10 had vasospastic angina, and 32 had mixed disease. The average age was 58.5 (SD 11.2) years. Demographics and prevalence of risk factors, such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or diabetes, showed no significant differences among the microvascular, vasospastic, or mixed disease groups. The prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) was high across the groups, and outcomes did not differ significantly among them. The SAQ-7 score average ranged from 16.9 to 40.3, consistent with moderate to severe angina, and the DASI score ranged from 32.2 to 34.9, consistent with moderate functional capacity. Dyspnea severity ranged from 30 to 41, consistent with low to moderate severity, and perceived stress ranged from 11.5 to 13, consistent with low to moderate stress among all participants. Conclusion In patients with ANOCA undergoing invasive CFA, demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, and outcomes were similar regardless of underlying diagnosis. We demonstrate a high prevalence of risk factors and HFpEF and evidence of moderate to severe symptoms and functional capacity in ANOCA patients across all diagnoses.Abbreviation explanation for table 1

Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with mixed angina and pure vasospastic angina

Long-term Outcome Comparison of Ostial/shaft Lesions in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Treated by PCI or CABG

Differences in clinical characteristics, angina, and quality of life among patients with microvascular vs vasospastic angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA)

Long-term Outcome Analysis of Patients Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Prior Ischemic Stroke

To evaluate whether the number of vessels disease has an impact on incidence of one year MACCE in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

The Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Anterior Wall and Non-Anterior Wall Acute Myocardial Infarction Referred to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ZHAO Mingzhong, HU Dayi, LI Tianchang, Et Al. Department of Cardiology, People's Hospi

Percutaneous Microaxial Ventricular Assist Device Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for Nonacute Myocardial Infarction Cardiogenic Shock

Long-term Outcomes of Multiple and Single Arterial Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus medical therapy in stable angina: a matched cohort study

[Related factors and the long-term outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention of premature acute myocardial infarction]

Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Severe Left Ventricular Dilatation

"One-Time" Versus Staged Multivessel Intervention in Intermediate to Very High-Risk Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Effect of complete percutaneous revascularization on improving long-term outcomes of patients with chronic total occlusion and multi-vessel disease

Staged revascularization vs. culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in elderly patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Comparison of One-Year Clinical Outcomes Between Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents for Left Main Lesions: A Single-Center Analysis of A 1,016-Patient Cohort

Long-term outcomes of ischaemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA): a systematic review and meta-analysis

Long-term outcome of acute myocardial infarction patients with early percutaneous coronary intervention to non-culprit vessels

Impact of different strategies of complete percutaneous revascularization on prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease

Complete revascularisation versus culprit lesion only PCI in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.

Comparison of long-term outcomes of complete vs. incomplete revascularization in elderly patients (≥75 years) with acute coronary syndrome and multi-vessel disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Comparison of clinical efficacy and prognosis between interventional occlusion and surgical treatment for acute myocardial infarction with ventricular septal perforation.