Abstract:Purpose The present study was designed to explore the prognostic value of preoperative inflammatory and nutritional biomarkers in stage III gastric cancer (GC) patients with adjuvant chemotherapy and to develop a novel scoring system called the inflammatory-nutritional prognostic score (INPS). Methods A total of 513 patients with pathological stage III GC undergoing radical gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy from 2010 to 2017 were enrolled in the study. Clinicopathological characteristics and blood test parameters of individual patients were collected. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression model was used for feature selection to construct INPS. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests. The nomogram was generated based on the result of the multivariate analysis using Cox’s proportional hazards model. The model was assessed by the concordance index (C-index) and was internally validated by bootstraps. Results According to the results of Lasso Cox regression and K-M survival curves, INPS was determined as follows: a low body mass index (BMI) (<23 kg/m 2 ), a low prealbumin (<180 mg/L), a high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (≥2.7), a high platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (≥209.4), a low lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) (<2.8), and a low prognostic nutritional index (PNI) (<45.1); each were scored as 1, and the remaining values were scored as 0. The individual scores were then summed up to construct the INPS and further divided into 4 groups: Low Risk (INPS 0); Low-medium Risk (INPS 1); High-medium Risk (INPS 2-4); and High Risk (INPS 5-6). In multivariate analysis, INPS was an independent predictor of overall survival (OS) in stage III GC, with the 5-year OS rates of 70.8%, 57.4%, 41.5%, and 30.6%, respectively. The nomogram based on INPS and other independent predictors (gender, pT stage, pN stage, lymphovascular invasion, and CEA level) showed good predicting performance with a C-index of 0.707, which was superior to the TNM stage alone (C-index 0.645, p =0.008) and was internally validated with the corrected C-index of 0.693. Conclusion Preoperative INPS was an independent prognostic factor of stage III GC patients with radical surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The nomogram based on INPS may serve as a simple and potential model in risk stratification and guiding treatment strategies in clinical practice.

Which Nutritional Scoring System Is More Suitable for Evaluating the Short- or Long-Term Prognosis of Patients with Gastric Cancer Who Underwent Radical Gastrectomy?

Preoperative Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score Predicts Short-Term Outcomes of Patients with Gastric Cancer after Laparoscopy-Assisted Radical Gastrectomy

Prognostic significance of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio in systemic inflammation-related indi-cators in gastric cancer patients after radical resection

Prognostic role of the prognostic nutritional index in patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent curative resection without preoperative neoadjuvant treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Can the Preoperative Nutritional Risk Score Be a Predictor of the Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients of Lung Transplantation: a Retrospective Study.

Nutritional Status Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Gastric Cancer Undergoing Radical Gastrectomy

The Predictive Values of Pretreatment Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score in Estimating Short- and Long-term Outcomes for Patients with Gastric Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Curative Gastrectomy

Prognostic Impact of Preoperative Naples Prognostic Score in Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Surgery

Controlling Nutritional Status score is superior to Prognostic Nutritional Index score in predicting survival and complications in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a Chinese propensity score matching study

Effects of prognostic nutrition index on side effects and prognosis of radiotherapy and chemotherapy after radical gastrectomy.

Prognostic value of three clinical nutrition scoring system (NRI, PNI, and CONUT) in elderly patients with prostate cancer

Preoperative controlling nutritional status as an optimal prognostic nutritional index to predict the outcome for colorectal cancer

To explore the predictive value of prognostic nutrition index (PNI) for clinical outcomes in selective surgery of gastrointestinal tumors

A comparison of three preoperative nutritional assessment methods for predicting ovarian cancer patient prognosis: which is better?

Prognostic Nutritional Index and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Are Respectively Associated with Prognosis of Gastric Cancer with Liver Metatasis Undergoing and without Hepatectomy

Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a prognostic marker for gastric cancer patients after curative resection

Prognostic nutritional index in predicting survival of patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: A systematic review

Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score as a New Indicator of Prognosis in Patients With Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Is Superior to NLR and PNI: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

A Novel Inflammatory-Nutritional Prognostic Scoring System for Stage III Gastric Cancer Patients With Radical Gastrectomy Followed by Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Comparison of Preoperative Nutritional Indexes for Outcomes after Primary Esophageal Surgery for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Prognostic Value of Inflammatory and Nutritional Scores in Renal Cell Carcinoma after Nephrectomy.