Abstract:The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Ahead of Print. Background:Quantitative analysis of the glenoid face knotless-type anchor placement for arthroscopic Bankart repair has not been reported.Purpose:To evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes after arthroscopic Bankart repair using knotless bioabsorbable anchors depending on the anchor location.Study design:Case series, Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A total of 124 patients (113 men and 11 women; age, 25.6 ± 7.5 years; follow-up time, 46.5 ± 18.2 months [range, 6.2-75.5 months]) who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with the bioabsorbable knotless anchor between 2017 and 2021 were included in this study. Among them, 118 patients were observed for >2 years (mean, 48.2 ± 16.8 months [range, 24-75.5 months]) and were analyzed for final clinical and radiologic outcomes. Using postoperative 6-month magnetic resonance imaging, remnant glenoid (%) and labral height were measured. Shoulder range of motion (ROM), radiographic osteoarthritic change, dislocation, apprehension test, and return to sports were recorded. Three groups were established based on the remnant glenoid, which represented the percentage of the exposed glenoid anteroposterior diameter to the original diameter using the best-fit circle method—group A: lower quartile; group B: interquartile; and group C: upper quartile—and variables were analyzed.Results:Overall, the remnant glenoid was 57% ± 6.4% (range, 41.5%-75%) after the surgery. Osteoarthritic change, dislocations, and positive apprehension tests were observed in 5 (4.2%), 4 (3.4%), and 12 (10.2%) patients, respectively. A total of 34 (28.8%) and 64 (54.2%) patients could return to sports without and with restrictions, respectively. Comparing groups A, B, and C, postoperative labral height (7 ± 1, 7 ± 2, and 7 ± 1 mm; P = .623), final osteoarthritic change (1, 4, and 0; P = .440), positive apprehension tests (5, 5, and 2; P = .387), and return to sports (complete/restricted/unable, 6/18/5, 19/29/11, 9/17/4; P = .769) were not different. All ROM were similar across the groups (all P > .054), except for external rotation (ER) at postoperative 6 months (41.3°± 12.8°; 50.2°± 18.5°; and 49.8°± 15.2°; P = .050). However, ER after 1 year was similar across the groups (all P > .544). In further analysis, patients with positive apprehension tests had lower labral height compared with others (5 [4-6] mm and 7 [6-8] mm; P < .001).Conclusion:In arthroscopic Bankart repair, the placement of knotless bioabsorbable anchors on the glenoid face, combined with the remplissage procedure or rotator interval closure, resulted in a low recurrence rate and moderate return to sports. However, most patients had some restrictions in returning to sports. Moreover, this technique was not associated with postoperative arthritis and shoulder stiffness, including ER deficit, which was not affected by the position of the anchor on the glenoid face for a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Curved-guide System is Useful in Achieving Optimized Trajectory for the Most Inferior Suture Anchor During Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.

Comparison of suture anchor penetration rate between navigation-assisted and traditional shoulder arthroscopic capsulolabral repair

Acetabular Subchondral and Cortical Perforation During Labral Repair With Suture Anchors: Influence of Portal Location, Curved Versus Straight Drill Guides, and Drill Starting Point

[Arthroscopic Repair of Bankart Lesion with Bioabsorbable Suture Anchors].

Clinical outcomes of transtibial versus anteromedial drilling techniques to prepare the femoral tunnel during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

[Effectiveness of a Single Threaded Anchor Fixation under Shoulder Arthroscopy in Treatment of Fresh Bony Bankart Injury].

Biomechanical evaluation of shoulder joint after Bankart lesion repair with anchors and drilling hole

[Arthroscopic Bankart Lesion Repair by Double-Row Vertical Mattress Suture with Anchors for Anteroinferior Glenohumeral Instability].

Angle Accuracy of Intramedullary Bone Resection Guides for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Effect of a Percutaneous Screw Guide on Screw Placement for Posterior Talar Fractures

Navigation-assisted anchor insertion in shoulder arthroscopy: a validity study

Knotless Bioabsorbable Anchors Placed on the Glenoid Face for Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

Portal Selection for Suture Anchor Placement During Hip Arthroscopic Labral Repair: A Study Based on 3-Dimensional Model Reconstruction

Postoperative curative effect of metal suture fixation with shoulder arthroscopy in the treatment of Bankart injury

The New Double‐row Bankart Repair Recovered Shoulder Stability without Excessive Motion Limitation: A Case–Control Study with Single‐row Bankart Repair

Real-world clinical accuracy of long cortical bone trajectory screw placement using a patient-specific template guide

Effect of tibial drill-guide angle on the mechanical environment at bone tunnel aperture after anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

An All-Suture Anchor Offers Equivalent Clinical Performance to an Established Solid Suture Anchor in the Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Trial with 12-Month Follow-Up

An All-Suture Anchor Offers Equivalent Clinical Performance to an Established Solid Suture Anchor in the Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center Trial With 12-Month Follow Up

Anatomical research of entry point for intramedullary guiding rod in uni-compartment knee arthroplasty

Functional Outcome of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair with Knotless Suture Anchor: A Retrospective Observational Study