Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy Reveals that Iron−Ligand Bonds Modulate Proteins in Different Modes
Guodong Yuan,Huaxing Liu,Qun Ma,Xi Li,Jingyuan Nie,Jinglin Zuo,Peng Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01573.s001
2019-01-01
Abstract:The iron−amino acid interactions Fe−O(Glu/Asp), Fe−N(His), and Fe− S(Cys) are the three major iron−ligand bonds in proteins. To compare their properties in proteins, we used atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based single-molecule force spectroscopy to investigate a superoxide reductase (Fe(III)-SOR) with all three types of bonds forming an Fe(His)4CysGlu center. We first found that Apo-SOR without bound iron showed multiple unfolding pathways only from the β-barrel core. Then, using HoloSOR with a ferric ion, we found that a single Fe−O(Glu) bond can tightly connect the flexible N-terminal fragment to the β-barrel and stabilize the whole protein, showing a complete protein unfolding scenario, while the single Fe−N(His) bond was weak and unable to provide such a stabilization. Moreover, when multiple Fe−N bonds are present, a similar stabilization effect can be achieved. Our results showed that the iron−ligand bond modulates protein structure and stability in different modes at the single-bond level. T metal ions are ubiquitous and play essential roles in biology. As the most abundant trace metal in the human body, iron is one of the most crucial chemical ingredients in life. Iron binds to proteins, and iron-containing proteins are indispensable for diverse biological processes such as oxygen storage and many critical, enzyme-catalyzed reactions. Iron binds to proteins mainly through the formation of three different metal−ligand coordination bonds, namely, to the carboxylate oxygen in glutamic/aspartic acid to form an Fe−O(Glu) bond, to the imidazole nitrogen in histidine to form an Fe−N(His) bond, and to the sulfur in cysteine to form an Fe−S(Cys) bond. Moreover, these bonds are usually present in the different types of proteins at different frequencies. Consequently, the comparison of the properties of these three different Fe−ligand bonds and their corresponding modulation modes for proteins provides valuable insight into the role of iron in protein structure and stability. To accurately characterize their contributions in one molecule, we chose AFM-based single-molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS) to study the iron binding effect in an ironcontaining protein superoxide reductase (SOR), which contains all three types of bonds (Fe−N(His), Fe−O(Glu), and Fe−S(Cys) bonds). SMFS, including single-molecule AFM and optical and magnetic tweezers, is a powerful technique that can mechanically manipulate single biomacromolecules. Among these techniques, single-molecule AFM has been widely applied to study protein (un)folding processes, protein−ligand interactions, and even chemical bonds because of its high force range. It is also used to study the metal−ligand coordination bonds in both inorganic and protein systems. Thus, we used AFM here to study the unfolding process of Fe(III)-SOR and to directly quantify the Fe−ligand bond strength. Fe(III)-SOR is a blue-colored protein whose biochemical and spectroscopic properties have been extensively characterized. SOR is a defense protein against reactive oxygen in anaerobic microbes that catalyzes the conversion of superoxide to hydrogen peroxide. The X-ray crystallography structure of the ferric form of SOR shows that the protein adopts an immunoglobulin (Ig)-like β-barrel fold core with seven β strands A−G and an N-terminal flexible fragment (N-frag) from residues 1−18. SOR contains a mononuclear, nonheme iron center that is coordinated by four imidazole nitrogens (His16, His41, His47, and His114, H16,41,47,114), one cysteinyl sulfur (Cys111, C111), and one glutamic carboxylate (Glu14, E14, COO−), forming a six-coordinate octahedral iron center, Fe(His)4CysGlu (Figure 1A). 33−35 Here, the glutamic acid is depronated under neutral pH and coordinates to the ferric ion as a monodentate ligand. In the Fe(III)-bound form (named the Holo-form), the Fe−O(Glu14) bond and the Fe− N(His16) bond connect the flexible N-terminal fragment to the β-barrel core. Interestingly, besides the six-coordinated metal center, the X-ray crystallographic structure shows that a half-quantity of Holo-SOR adopts a five-coordinate iron site lacking the Fe−O bond, and the biological meaning is still unclear. Nevertheless, two types of iron centers exist in the Holo-SOR as the N-terminal fragment is connected to the iron center with both an Fe−O(Glu14) bond and an Fe−N(His16) bond or with only one Fe−N(His16) bond. Consequently, the Received: June 1, 2019 Accepted: August 21, 2019 Published: August 21, 2019 Letter pubs.acs.org/JPCL Cite This: J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 5428−5433 © XXXX American Chemical Society 5428 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01573 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 5428−5433 D ow nl oa de d vi a N A N JI N G U N IV o n Se pt em be r 2, 2 01 9 at 1 2: 16 :3 5 (U T C ). Se e ht tp s: //p ub s. ac s. or g/ sh ar in gg ui de lin es f or o pt io ns o n ho w to le gi tim at el y sh ar e pu bl is he d ar tic le s.