Abstract:Pulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a relatively uncommon, high-grade neuroendocrine tumor sharing several features with small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). LCNEC is considered aggressive, and the optimal treatment strategy and chemotherapy regimen remain undefined. We retrospectively evaluated a LCNEC patient cohort established from 1997 to 2015 at Mayo Clinic (Minnesota). A diagnosis of LCNEC was made when all WHO classification criteria were present in the tumor section examined. Clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes were analyzed. Available radiology assessment was evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria. The study included 55 LCNEC patients. Median age at diagnosis was 63 years (range: 38-88); two thirds were men; and majority were smokers (94%). Clinical staging was I, II, III or IV in 52.8%, 9.1%, 14.5%, and 23.6% of cases, respectively. Forty-six percent of stage IV patients presented with brain metastases at time of diagnosis (n=6/13) and 18% (n=7/38) developed brain recurrence in the follow up period. Thirty-nine (71%) patients had surgery and 9 (16%) patients received adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Sixty-five percent of patients with complete resection experienced disease recurrence with 80% recurring within 2 years of resection. Treatment data for first-line palliative chemotherapy were available on 23 patients: 10 received platinum/etoposide and 13 received other regimens. In 19 patients with available imaging; the overall response rate was 52.6% (95% CI, 31.7-72.7) and there was no difference in ORR between platinum/etoposide (ORR=55.6%) or platinum plus other agents (paclitaxel or pemetrexed; ORR=55.6%). The median survival time was 26.3 months (95%CI; 18.6-33.9); the 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates (OS) were 75%, 53%, 36%, and 30%, respectively. Patients who received platinum/etoposide demonstrated longer median time to progression (TTP), and median OS than those who received ‘other’ regimens (14.7 months vs. 7.1 months; p value 0.07, and 28.2 months vs. 21.1 months; p value 0.22, respectively); the differences did not reach conventional statistical significance, likely due to the small sample size. Rigorous pathologic confirmation and genomic analysis are ongoing. LCNEC is associated with a poor prognosis and high recurrence rates after surgery. Advanced LCNEC patients are at high risk for brain metastases, therefore, routine brain imaging surveillance during follow-up may be beneficial. The chemotherapeutic responsiveness of LCNEC patients was intermediate between that of NSCLC and SCLC patients. Future prospective, multicenter, clinical trials are needed to determine the best chemotherapy regimen for these rare tumors.

Comparative Study of Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Small Cell Lung Carcinoma in High-Grade Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Lung: a Large Population-Based Study

1114P Comparative Study of Combined Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Combined Small Cell Carcinoma in Resected High-Grade Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Lung

Comparative Study of Pulmonary Combined Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Combined Small-Cell Carcinoma in Surgically Resected High-Grade Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Lung

Clinical and Pathologic Differences between Small-Cell Carcinoma and Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung

Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Shares Similarity with Small Cell Carcinoma on the Basis of Clinical and Pathological Features.

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A large population-based analysis

Incidence, survival comparison, and novel prognostic evaluation approaches for stage iii-iv pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell lung cancer

Distinct clinicopathologic features, genomic characteristics and survival of central and peripheral pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: From different origin cells?

Differences between Advanced Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Advanced Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Different Characteristics and Survival between Surgically Resected Pure and Combined Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Comparison of Genomic Landscapes of Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma, Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, and Large Cell Carcinoma.

Disparity in Clinical Outcomes Between Pure and Combined Pulmonary Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study.

Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and survival of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a SEER population-based study

The demographic and treatment options for patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung

Lung Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: an Analysis of Patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) Database

Molecular Characterization of NSCLC-like and SCLC-like Subsets in Chinese Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (LCNEC).

Comparative Study of the Genomic Landscape and Tumor Microenvironment among Large Cell Carcinoma of the Lung, Large Cell Neuroendocrine of the Lung, and Small Cell Lung Cancer

P1.07-036 Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: the Mayo Clinic Experience

Exploring the molecular features and genetic prognostic factors of pulmonary high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas

Characterization of Genomic Alterations in Chinese LCNEC and SCLC Via Comprehensive Genomic Profiling.

The outcomes of different regimens depend on the molecular subtypes of pulmonary large‐cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: A retrospective study in China