Abstract:BackgroundIn biomedical research, response variables are often encountered which have bounded support on the open unit interval - (0,1). Traditionally, researchers have attempted to estimate covariate effects on these types of response data using linear regression. Alternative modelling strategies may include: beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression, and fractional logit regression models. This study employs a Monte Carlo simulation design to compare the statistical properties of the linear regression model to that of the more novel beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression, and fractional logit regression models.MethodsIn the Monte Carlo experiment we assume a simple two sample design. We assume observations are realizations of independent draws from their respective probability models. The randomly simulated draws from the various probability models are chosen to emulate average proportion/percentage/rate differences of pre-specified magnitudes. Following simulation of the experimental data we estimate average proportion/percentage/rate differences. We compare the estimators in terms of bias, variance, type-1 error and power. Estimates of Monte Carlo error associated with these quantities are provided.ResultsIf response data are beta distributed with constant dispersion parameters across the two samples, then all models are unbiased and have reasonable type-1 error rates and power profiles. If the response data in the two samples have different dispersion parameters, then the simple beta regression model is biased. When the sample size is small (N0 = N1 = 25) linear regression has superior type-1 error rates compared to the other models. Small sample type-1 error rates can be improved in beta regression models using bias correction/reduction methods. In the power experiments, variable-dispersion beta regression and fractional logit regression models have slightly elevated power compared to linear regression models. Similar results were observed if the response data are generated from a discrete multinomial distribution with support on (0,1).ConclusionsThe linear regression model, the variable-dispersion beta regression model and the fractional logit regression model all perform well across the simulation experiments under consideration. When employing beta regression to estimate covariate effects on (0,1) response data, researchers should ensure their dispersion sub-model is properly specified, else inferential errors could arise.

Reducing Bias in Beta Regression Models Using Jackknifed Liu-Type Estimators: Applications to Chemical Data

A New Method to Solve Robust Data Reconciliation in Nonlinear Process

A permutation-based approach to inference for weighted sum regression with correlated chemical mixtures

Robust Liu Estimator Used to Combat Some Challenges in Partially Linear Regression Model by Improving LTS Algorithm Using Semidefinite Programming

Unsupervised Liu-type shrinkage estimators for mixture of regression models

Jackknife Model Averaging for Mixed-Data Kernel-Weighted Spline Quantile Regressions

A Monte Carlo simulation study comparing linear regression, beta regression, variable-dispersion beta regression and fractional logit regression at recovering average difference measures in a two sample design

Liu-type Negative Binomial Regression: A Comparison of Recent Estimators and Applications

Learning Models from Data with Measurement Error: Tackling Underreporting

New ridge estimators in the inverse Gaussian regression: Monte Carlo simulation and application to chemical data

Beta regression for double‐bounded response with correlated high‐dimensional covariates

Correction of overfitting bias in regression models

Liu-type Shrinkage Estimators for Mixture of Logistic Regressions: An Osteoporosis Study

A simulation-based estimation method for bias reduction

Jackknife empirical likelihood confidence intervals for assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis of rare binary event data

Bias correction for multiple covariate analysis using empirical bayesian estimation in mixed-effects models for longitudinal data

A regression-based method for detecting publication bias in multivariate meta-analysis

Liu Estimator in the Multinomial Logistic Regression Model

Bias Correction and Robust Inference in Semiparametric Models

Relaxing the Accurate Imputation Assumption in Doubly Robust Learning for Debiased Collaborative Filtering

Robust Inference under the Beta Regression Model with Application to Health Care Studies