Abstract:Label distribution learning (LDL) is a generalized machine learning framework for dealing with label ambiguity, as it can explore the relative importance levels of different labels in the description of each sample. Although several algorithms have been proposed to solve LDL problems, they usually destroy the consistency of geometric structures between feature space and label space to a certain extent, which frequently plays a significant role in learning tasks. Meanwhile, most existing LDL algorithms only take predictive performances into consideration, while ignoring the computational cost and robustness to noises. To remedy above deficiencies, we propose a novel algorithm, i.e., Local Collaborative Representation based Label Distribution Learning, shortly LCR-LDL. In LCR-LDL, an unlabeled sample is treated as the collaborative representation of the local dictionary constructed by the neighborhood of the unlabeled sample, and the discriminatory information of representation coefficients is used to reconstruct the label distribution of the unlabeled sample. Experimental results on 20 real-world LDL data sets compared with results produced by 11 state-of-the-art algorithms show that, the proposed LCR-LDL algorithm can not only effectively improve the predictive performances for LDL tasks, but also exhibit higher robustness and a lightweight computational overhead. This study suggests new trends for considering the computational cost and robustness issues in the LDL community.

Label Distribution Learning with Label-Specific Features.

Label-dependent Feature Exploration for Label Distribution Learning

Two-stage Label Distribution Learning with Label-Independent Prediction Based on Label-Specific Features

Label distribution learning by utilizing common and label-specific feature fusion space

Label Distribution Learning: A Local Collaborative Mechanism

Label Distribution Learning by Exploiting Feature-Label Correlations Locally

Label Distribution Learning by Exploiting Label Correlations.

Latent Semantics Encoding for Label Distribution Learning.

Label Distribution Learning by Exploiting Sample Correlations Locally.

Unified Framework for Learning with Label Distribution

Classification with Label Distribution Learning.

Label distribution learning by maintaining label ranking relation

Label Distribution Learning with High-Order Label Correlations.

Fast Label Enhancement for Label Distribution Learning

Label Distribution Learning Through Exploring Nonnegative Components

Label Distribution Learning by Regularized Sample Self-Representation

Label Distribution Learning with Label Correlations on Local Samples

Label distribution feature selection based on label-specific features

Label Distribution Learning Forests

Label Distribution Learning by Exploiting Fuzzy Label Correlation

Label Distribution Learning by Exploiting Label Distribution Manifold