Abstract:In recent years, school psychology has given increasing attention to issues of social justice and antiracism. While such orientations are not new, the scope and centrality of these movements within the field are, as is the growing appreciation of the need to integrate them across all areas of professional activities and efforts in school psychology. The aim of this special topic section is to create a space for scholarship addressing a broad range of issues relevant to advancing equity and justice in school psychology. In particular, we seek to curate diverse scholarship that expands the ways we conceptualize, design, implement, and interpret school psychology research, as well as how we approach graduate preparation and practice in school psychology to advance equitable and just services for individuals from historically and systemically marginalized backgrounds. The resulting compilation of articles provide insight into how school psychologists can approach scholarship, practice, and professional education to advance antiracism, social justice, and equity. Themes include expanding the nature and scope of school psychology scholarship by confronting the detriments of whiteness and epistemic exclusion; centering equity, healing, and minoritized voices in practice; and leveraging diverse research methods, including participatory approaches, to elevate youth and family voices in addressing some of the most pressing issues in schools. Impact Statement School psychology has given increasing attention to issues of social justice and antiracism, with growing appreciation of the need to integrate them across all professional activities. This article contributes important information regarding how these broad efforts can be supported by confronting the detriments of epistemic exclusion and whiteness in scholarship; centering equity, healing, and minoritized voices in practice; and leveraging diverse research methods, including participatory approaches.

A decolonized science requires bigger, bolder, and less incremental change: Commentary on Sharpe (2024).

Editor bias and diversifying psychology: Commentary on Sharpe (2024).

On editor bias and transparency: Reply to Cowan (2024), King (2024), and Thurston and Noor (2024).

To reduce editor bias and increase diversity and transparency, editors must be motivated: Commentary on Sharpe (2024).

Editor bias and transparency in psychology's open science era.

Dealing With Diversity in Psychology: Science and Ideology

Toward the advancement of equity in scientific publishing.

Decolonisation and socio-political arenas in science education: reflecting on the role of biological education

Diversity Accountability Index for Journals (DAI-J): Increasing awareness and establishing accountability across psychology journals

Towards Decolonising Computational Sciences

The Effects of Editorial-Board Diversity on Race Scholars and Their Scholarship: A Field Experiment

Dealing With Diversity in Psychology: Science or Ideology?

Psychology needs more diversity at the level of Editor-in-Chief

Theory, Methods, and Practice to Advance Equity and Social Justice in School Psychology: Articulating a Path Forward

Liberal Bias on Psychology: A Comment on Bartels (2023)

Reducing racial bias in scientific communication: Journal policies and their influence on reporting racial demographics.

Improving equity, diversity, and inclusion in academia

Pushing Back Against the Microaggression Pushback in Academic Psychology: Reflections on a Concept-Creep Paradox

Hits and misses in the last decade of open science: Researchers from different subfields and career stages offer personal reflections and suggestions

A Call for Keeping Doors Open and for Parallel Efforts

Towards Equitable, Social Justice Criticality: Re-Constructing the “Black” Box and Making it Transparent for the Future of Science and Technology in Science Education