Survival Significance of Patients with Low Prostate-Specific Antigen and High-Grade Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiotherapy, or External Beam Radiotherapy with Brachytherapy.

Yadong Guo,Shiyu Mao,Aihong Zhang,Junfeng Zhang,Longsheng Wang,Ruiliang Wang,Wentao Zhang,Ziwei Zhang,Yuan Wu,Xuan Cao,Bin Yang,Xudong Yao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00638
IF: 4.7
2019-01-01
Frontiers in Oncology
Abstract:Objective: This study compared survival of prostate cancer patients with low prostate specific antigen level (PSA <= 10 ng/ml) and high-grades of Gleason score (GS) of 8-10 with different treatment options (i.e., radical prostatectomy [RP], external beam radiotherapy [EBRT], or external beam radiotherapy with brachytherapy [EBRT+BT]). Materials and Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database data (2004-2013), and overall survival (OS) and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model and Fine and Gray competing risk model. Results: The SEER data contained 9,114 patients, 4,175 of whom received RP, 4,114 received EBRT, and 825 received EBRT+BT with a median follow-up duration of 47 months. RP patients had significantly better OS than patients with EBRT and EBRT+BT (adjusted HR [AHR]: 3.36, 95% CI: 2.43-4.64, P < 0.001; AHR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.32-3.48, P = 0.002; respectively). There was no statistical difference in PCSM between RP and EBRT+BT (AHR: 1.31, 95% CI: 0.61-2.80, P = 0.485), while EBRT had worse OS (P < 0.05). The subgroup analysis revealed that there was no statistical difference in prognosis of patients with age of >70 years old, or PSA levels of <= 2.5 ng/ml between RP and EBRT+BT (P > 0.05). Conclusion: RP patients with low PSA levels and high GS had better OS compared to either EBRT or EBRT+BT, while RP and EBRT+BT resulted in significantly lower PCSM, compared to EBRT. Moreover, EBRT+BT and RP were associated with similar survival of patients with age of > 70 years old, or PSA levels of <= 2.5 ng/ml.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?