Preoperative N Stage Evaluation in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients Using Multidetector CT: Can the Sum of the Diameters of Metastatic LNs Be Used for N Stage Evaluation?

J. M. You,T. U. Kim,S. Kim,N. K. Lee,J. W. Lee,H. Ryu,J. H. Kim,S. B. Hong,T. Y. Jeon,D. Y. Park
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2019.06.030
IF: 3.389
2019-01-01
Clinical Radiology
Abstract:AIM: To compare the diagnostic performance of total counts of metastatic lymph nodes (LNsum) and conventional multidetector (MD) computed tomography (CT) staging in the nodal evaluation of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 127 consecutive patients who underwent preoperative MDCT and gastrectomy for AGC were identified. Metastatic LNs on MDCT were defined as LNs with a short axis >= 8 mm, marked or heterogeneous enhancement, and morphological features (central necrosis, round shape, clustering). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the N-stage using LN-sum and conventional MDCT staging were generated and compared. In addition, metastatic LN counts between the MDCT and the histopathological examinations and correlation between LN-sum and histopathological nodal status were analysed. RESULTS: The total counts of metastatic LNs on MDCT was significantly smaller than those detected in histopathological assessments (p<0.0001). LN-sum showed significant correlation with the pathological N stage and the number of metastatic LNs (rho=0.69, 0.73, p<0.0001). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.896, and 0.835, for N stage >= N2 and N3, with cut-off values of 12.5 and 23.5 mm, respectively. LN-sum provided better diagnostic performance than conventional MDCT staging for discriminating N0-2 versus N3; sensitivity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of LN-sum were significantly higher (80.4 versus 52.2%, 81.1 versus 68.5%, 71.2 versus 57.1%, and 88 versus 74.1%). CONCLUSION: LN-sum may be sufficiently useful in assessing the N3 stage of AGC and may help to plan appropriate therapy for AGC patients. (C) 2019 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?