Abstract:4052 Background: Ivor Lewis (Iv) and McKeown (Mc) are two commonly used minimally invasive esophagectomy. Currently, there are limited data to compare effectiveness and safety between Iv and Mc in China. Methods: We conduct the study based on a national collaborative prospective esophageal cancer (EC) database (designed by LinkDoc Technology Co, Ltd.).EC patients who underwent Iv or Mc esophagectomy from Jan.2010 to Jun.2017 and pathologically confirmed stage Ⅰ~Ⅲ with middle thoracic and lower thoracic esophagus were enrolled. Log-rank test was used in the comparison of the two surgery groups. And Cox’s proportional hazard models and logistic regression were used in the factors analyses. Results: Total 1862 patients (1447 males and 415 females) were enrolled, mean age of 61.4.8±7.9. Among the patients, there were 97.2% squamous cell carcinoma, 1% adenocarcinoma and 1.8% others. 667 were performed with Iv esophagectomy and 1195 patients with Mc esophagectomy. Number of lymph nodes examined,mean was 14.4 ±9.02 in Iv group, compared with 21.5±11.57 in Mc group, p< 0.05. Recurrence rate was 12.3% in Iv group and 7.6% in Mc group, p< 0.05. The 5 years overall survival (OS) was 51% in Iv group and 59% in Mc group, p< 0.05. Multivariate analysis showed that risk factors for EC recurrence after esophagectomy include operation type (Iv vs Mc, odds ratio 1.70, CI 1.187-2.430), N stage and T stage, p< 0.05. Operation type (Ic vs Mc, HR 1.49, CI 1.153-1.928), N stage and T stage were hazard factors for OS in analysis of multivariate cox’s proportional hazard models, p< 0.05. Especially, for the subgroup diagnosed as stage T3 at middle thoracic esophagus, Recurrence and OS were significantly different according to surgery type. Median blood loss was 300 mL in Iv group compared with 200 mL in Mc group, p< 0.05. Post-operative complications was significantly less in Iv group, p< 0.05. Conclusions: Our data showed that Mc is preferred with better lymphadenectomy, lower recurrence and improved survival compared with Iv, especially for patients diagnosed as stage T3 at middle thoracic esophagus. And Lv showed significantly less severe post-operative complications than Mc. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1800014802.

Thoracolaparoscopic McKeown Esophagectomy

[Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Esophageal Carcinoma].

Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Carcinoma

Comparison of Clinical Outcome and Safety after Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis Versus McKeown—A Real-World Multicenter Observational Study from China.

Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery for Esophagectomy: Evolution and Prosperity

Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Treatment of Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma

Treatment of Early-Stage Upper And/or Middle Thoracic Esophageal Cancer with a New Muscle-Sparing Thoracotomy

[One Hundred Years of Evolution of Esophageal Surgical Approach and Clinical Significance].

[Apico-Thoracic Retro-Aortic Anastomosis in Radical Operation for Esophageal Carcinoma].

Video-assisted mediastinoscopic and laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

[Electronic Fiberesophagoscopy in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Benign Esophageal Diseases].

[Evaluation of Safety of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Carcinoma].

Primary experience of a modified totally thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown procedure for esophageal cancer

Efficacy and complications of endoscopic thoracoscopic versus laparoscopic radical esophagectomy in esophageal cancer treatment: A retrospective study

Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Sleeve Lobectomy with Bronchoplasty

Ecmo-Assisted Esophagectomy after Left Pneumonectomy

[Application of Different Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Surgery for Esophageal Cancer].

A Comparison of Different Surgical Approaches for the Treatment of Thoracic Middle/lower Segment Esophageal Cancer

Minimally invasive esophagectomy with non-invasive ventilation by laryngeal mask-assisted anesthesia for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: case report

Application of a Modified McKeown Procedure (thoracoscopic Esophageal Mobilization Three-Incision Esophagectomy) in Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Initial Experience with 30 Cases.

Society for Translational Medicine Expert Consensus on the Selection of Surgical Approaches in the Management of Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma.