Integrated Assessment of PD-L1 Expression and Molecular Classification Facilitates Therapy Selection and Prognosis Prediction in Gastric Cancer

Yeqi Sun,Wenwei Yu,Wenbin Guan,Lei Cai,Meng Qiao,Leizhen Zheng,Ruiqi Jiang,Ruifen Wang,Lifeng Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s206189

2019-01-01

Cancer Management and Research

Abstract:Purpose Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway has emerged as a novel therapy for cancer. To identify rational candidates for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in gastric cancer (GC), the abundance of PD-L1 expression was evaluated on a kind of biomarker-based molecular classification for shaping prognosis and treatment planning. Methods One hundred and sixty-five GCs were classified into five subgroups using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) methods, based on a panel of seven markers (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, MSH6, E-cadherin, P53, and Epstein-Barr virus mRNA). The expression of PD-L1 in GC tissues was analyzed immunohistochemically. Results The five categories (Epstein–Barr virus positivity, microsatellite instability, aberrant E-cadherin, aberrant P53 expression, and normal P53 expression) correspond to the reported molecular subgroups for similar proportions and clinicopathologic characteristics. Survival analysis indicated that subgroups with aberrant E-cadherin expression independently predicted a worse prognosis in GC patients (HR=2.51, P=0.010). The clinical and prognostic profiles produced by this stratification in nonintestinal-type GC were distinguishable from those in intestinal-type. Although PD-L1 was not a significant prognostic factor, that more frequent presence of PD-L1-positive in microsatellite instability tumors than other subtypes (P<0.010) hinted at a prolonged clinical course. Moreover, the lowest level of PD-L1 but the highest of Her2 was observed in the group of aberrant P53, namely it was suggested that there was a negative correlation between PD-L1 and Her2 overexpression. Conclusion Different molecular subtypes in GC may have a tendency to react differently to anti-PD-L1/PD-1 immunotherapy or anti-Her2 therapy. A combination of PD-L1 expression and this cost-effective classification strategy would be helpful for predicting prognosis and promoting personalized therapy in clinical practice.