Prognostic Significance of Molecular Characteristics of Cerebrospinal Fluid for Non‐small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Leptomeningeal Metastasis

Ning Li,Yutao Liu,Jianchun Duan,Boyan Yang,Hua Bai,Rui Sun,Lei Yu,Jie Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13123
IF: 3.223
2019-01-01
Thoracic Cancer
Abstract:BackgroundStudies in EGFR+ non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) comparing survival rates and gene mutation detection with matched cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma are relatively scarce. We evaluated gene mutations, treatment strategies, and clinical outcomes in EGFR+ NSCLC patients with LM.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed gene mutation status in the CSF and plasma of 32 EGFR+ NSCLC patients with LM for prognostic significance.ResultsThe rate of LM disease control was significantly higher in patients that switched EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatments, initiated EGFR‐TKIs, or received high‐dose EGFR‐TKI treatment than those who continued their current EGFR‐TKI treatment, received chemotherapy, or were not administered antitumor treatment (24/24, 100.0% vs. 1/8, 12.5%; P = 0.000). Overall survival was 27.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.0–37.5), median survival after LM was 7.0 months (95% CI 5.0–11.0), and median survival before LM was 17.0 months (95% CI 12–25.5). Median survival after LM was significantly shorter in patients with “worse” status (n = 7) than in those with “improved/stable” status (n = 25; 4.2 [95% CI 2.2–6.1] vs. 33.7 [95% CI 25.5–41.8] months, HR 10.114, 95% CI 0.29–1.37; P = 0.008).ConclusionsEGFR‐TKIs should be the priority course of treatment in EGFR+ NSCLC patients after a diagnosis of LM. Liquid biopsy in both plasma and CSF, as well as dynamic detection, play important roles in the direction of treatment for such patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?