Variation of subclinical psychosis as a function of population density across different European settings: Findings from the multi‐national EU‐GEI study
Giuseppe D'Andrea,Diego Quattrone,Giada Tripoli,Edoardo Spinazzola,Charlotte Gayer‐Anderson,Hannah E. Jongsma,Lucia Sideli,Simona A. Stilo,Caterina La Cascia,Laura Ferraro,Daniele La Barbera,Andrea Tortelli,Eva Velthorst,Lieuwe de Haan,Pierre‐Michel Llorca,Jose Luis Santos,Manuel Arrojo,Julio Bobes,Julio Sanjuán,Miguel Bernardo,Celso Arango,James B. Kirkbride,Peter B. Jones,Bart P. Rutten,Franck Schürhoff,Andrei Szöke,Jim van Os,Evangelos Vassos,Jean‐Paul Selten,Craig Morgan,Marta Di Forti,Ilaria Tarricone,Robin M. Murray
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13767
2024-11-02
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Abstract:Background Urbanicity is a well‐established risk factor for psychosis. Our recent multi‐national study found an association between urbanicity and clinical psychosis in Northern Europe but not in Southern Europe. In this study, we hypothesized that the effect of current urbanicity on variation of schizotypy would be greater in North‐western Europe countries than in Southern Europe ones. Methods We recruited 1080 individuals representative of the populations aged 18–64 of 14 different sites within 5 countries, classified as either North‐western Europe (England, France, and The Netherlands) with Southern Europe (Spain and Italy). Our main outcome was schizotypy, assessed through the Structured Interview for Schizotypy‐Revised. Our main exposure was current urbanicity, operationalized as local population density. A priori confounders were age, sex, ethnic minority status, childhood maltreatment, and social capital. Schizotypy variation was assessed using multi‐level regression analysis. To test the differential effect of urbanicity between North‐western and Southern European, we added an interaction term between population density and region of recruitment. Results Population density was associated with schizotypy (β = 0.248,95%CI = 0.122–0.375;p
psychiatry