Abstract:Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a typical risk assessment and prevention technology, in which different experts provide different assessments on the target system to identify the risk grades of its components. Sometimes, the assessments contain conflict information. How to manage and fuse the conflict assessment information is an open issue. We propose a triangular distribution-based basic probability assignment (TDBPA) method to model and fuse the conflict risk level coming from different experts' assessments in the frame of Dempster-Shafer evidence theory. First, the subjective assessments of risk analysis from domain experts are modeled with belief structure in Dempster-Shafer evidence theory. Then, the assessments are transformed as the TDBPA function. Thirdly, the conflict risk assessments from the FMEA team for failure analysis can be fused with Dempster rule of combination. After that, the modified risk priority number (RPN) model based on fused assessment can be calculated for ranking of failure modes. Finally, recommended actions should be taken for prevention of potential risk items. We verify the rationality and efficiency of the proposed method with a case study in the blades of an aircraft turbine. In short, the presented FMEA methodology procedure in this paper is well organized so that we can apply it in a more simple and understandable way. Utilizing the character of triangular distribution, taking adjacent values into account, TDBPA method can smooth the conflict assessment for information fusion. In addition, the shortcoming of repeating values in classical RPN is eliminated in the proposed method, which improves the ability for risk assessment of FMEA.

A New Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Method Based on Dempster–Shafer Theory by Integrating Evidential Network

A Modified Model of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Based on Generalized Evidence Theory

AMWRPN: Ambiguity Measure Weighted Risk Priority Number Model for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis.

An Improved Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Method Using Belief Jensen–Shannon Divergence and Entropy Measure in the Evidence Theory

Deng Entropy Weighted Risk Priority Number Model for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis

A New Method to Evaluate Risk in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis under Fuzzy Information.

A Novel Method for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Using Fuzzy Evidential Reasoning and Fuzzy Petri Nets

A new method in failure mode and effects analysis based on evidential reasoning

An Improved Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Method Based on Uncertainty Measure in the Evidence Theory

A Novel Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Model Using Triangular Distribution-Based Basic Probability Assignment in the Evidence Theory

A Novel Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Method Based on Fuzzy Evidential Reasoning Rules.

A Novel Method for Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Based on the Fermatean Fuzzy Set and Bonferroni Mean Operator

Failure mode and effects analysis using an improved pignistic probability transformation function and grey relational projection method

Uncertainty Management in Assessment of FMEA Expert Based on Negation Information and Belief Entropy

Modeling and Fusing the Uncertainty of FMEA Experts Using an Entropy-Like Measure with an Application in Fault Evaluation of Aircraft Turbine Rotor Blades

Evidential FMEA method for human reliability assessment

An Improved Risk Priority Number Model for FMEA Based on Belief Measure

New Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Based on D Numbers Downscaling Method

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis on the Air System of an Aero Turbofan Engine Using the Gaussian Model and Evidence Theory

Risk Evaluation in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Based on D Numbers Theory.

Fusion of expert uncertain assessment in FMEA based on the negation of basic probability assignment and evidence distance