Abstract:Background The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) has become one of the most widely used measurement tools in child and adolescent mental health work across the globe. The SDQ was originally developed and validated within the UK and whilst its reliability and validity have been replicated in several countries important cross cultural issues have been raised. We describe normative data, reliability and validity of the Chinese translation of the SDQ (parent, teacher and self report versions) in a large group of children from Shanghai. Methods The SDQ was administered to the parents and teachers of students from 12 of Shanghai's 19 districts, aged between 3 and 17 years old, and to those young people aged between 11 and 17 years. Retest data was collected from parents and teachers for 45 students six weeks later. Data was analysed to describe normative scores, bandings and cut-offs for normal, borderline and abnormal scores. Reliability was assessed from analyses of internal consistency, inter-rater agreement, and temporal stability. Structural validity, convergent and discriminant validity were assessed. Results Full parent and teacher data was available for 1965 subjects and self report data for 690 subjects. Normative data for this Chinese urban population with bandings and cut-offs for borderline and abnormal scores are described. Principle components analysis indicates partial agreement with the original five factored subscale structure however this appears to hold more strongly for the Prosocial Behaviour, Hyperactivity – Inattention and Emotional Symptoms subscales than for Conduct Problems and Peer Problems. Internal consistency as measured by Cronbach's α coefficient were generally low ranging between 0.30 and 0.83 with only parent and teacher Hyperactivity – Inattention and teacher Prosocial Behaviour subscales having α > 0.7. Inter-rater correlations were similar to those reported previously (range 0.23 – 0.49) whilst test retest reliability was generally lower than would be expected (range 0.40 – 0.79). Convergent and discriminant validity are supported. Conclusion We report mixed findings with respect the psychometric properties of the Chinese translation of the SDQ. Reliability is a particular concern particularly for Peer Problems and self ratings by adolescents. There is good support for convergent validity but only partial support for structural validity. It may be possible to resolve some of these issues by carefully examining the wording and meaning of some of the current questions.

Measurement Equivalence of the SDQ in Chinese Adolescents: A Horizontal and Longitudinal Perspective.

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Self-Reporting Questionnaire 20 (Srq-20) in Community Settings

Measuring Adolescent Psychopathology: Psychometric Properties of the Self-Report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in A Sample of Chinese Adolescents

The Use of the SDQ with Chinese Adolescents in the Clinical Context

The Validity, Reliability and Normative Scores of the Parent, Teacher and Self Report Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in China.

Application of Chinese Version of the Self-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnair in a Sample of 832 Adolescents

Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Strengths and Difficulties Self-Report Questionnaire in 12 Asian and European Countries

Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire in Chinese Adolescents with and Without Major Depressive Disorder: A Horizontal and Longitudinal Perspective

Reliability and Validity of the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire in Chinese Adolescents

Investigating psychometric properties of short versions of the depressive experiences questionnaire: Findings from a representative large sample of Chinese adolescents

Measurement properties of the Chinese version of the Youth Quality of Life Instrument-Weight Module (YQOL-W).

Results of the parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in 22,108 primary school students from 8 provinces of China

Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (short Form) Across Genders, Time Points and Presence of Major Depressive Disorder among Chinese Adolescents

Can Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ) Be Used in China?

A Study on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire(SDQ)

Reliability and Validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire's Self-report Version for Adolescents

A115: Revision of the Chinese Version of Physical Self-Description Questionnaire-Short for Middle School Students

Factor structure of the CES-D and measurement invariance across gender in Mainland Chinese adolescents.

The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents (ERQ-CA): Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance in a Chinese Student Samples

Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Chinese version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale among undergraduates and clinical patients

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version O F Questionnaire - Children with Difficulties for Chinese Children or Adolescents with Attention- Deficit/hyperactivity Disorder: Across-Sectional Survey