Determinants of Place of Death for End-Stage Cancer Patients: Evidence from China.

Zhong Li,Shan Jiang,Chengzhong Xu,Fangfang Lu,Ruibo He,Zijin Pan,Pei Zhang,Liang Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzz064
2019-01-01
International Journal for Quality in Health Care
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To determine factors influence place of death (POD) for end-stage cancer patients and investigate how the healthcare utilization mediates on the effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on POD. DESIGN A population-based, retrospective study from July 2015 to June 2017. SETTING Yichang, China. PARTICIPANTS 894 end-stage cancer patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE POD. RESULTS Patients of hospital death experience more inpatient hospitalization services (IHS) and emergency department visits. Patients enrolled in the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme (OR = 7.60, P < 0.001) and Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance (OR = 28.0, P < 0.001) have higher rates of hospital death than those in the Urban Resident-based Basic Medical Insurance. Living with spouse (OR = 1.72, P = 0.019) and receiving higher education (OR = 1.92, P = 0.004), increase the likelihood of hospital death by 72% and 92%, respectively. The probability of hospital death will increase by 14% and decrease by 4% per IHS and outpatient services occur, respectively. Outpatient services (Z = -2.28, P < 0.001), and IHS (Z = 2.17, P < 0.001) mediate 1.81% and 1.89%, respectively, of the effect of health insurance on POD. The overall effect of the mediators is non-statistically significant (Z = 0.09, P = 0.825). CONCLUSION POD is mainly driven by SES. The relationship between health insurance and POD is partly mediated by outpatient services and IHS, respectively. The results corroborated that hospital and home services should be coherently bridged. Furthermore, benefit packages for end-stage cancer patients could be redesigned.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?