Abstract:We consider the problem of locating a single facility on the real line. This facility serves a set of agents, each of whom is located on the line, and incurs a cost equal to his distance from the facility. An agent's location is private information that is known only to him. Agents report their location to a central planner who decides where to locate the facility. The planner's objective is to minimize a "social" cost function that depends on the agent-costs. However, agents might not report truthfully; to address this issue, the planner must restrict himself to {\em strategyproof} mechanisms, in which truthful reporting is a dominant strategy for each agent. A mechanism that simply chooses the optimal solution is generally not strategyproof, and so the planner aspires to use a mechanism that effectively {\em approximates} his objective function. In our paper, we study the problem described above with the social cost function being the $L_p$ norm of the vector of agent-costs. We show that the median mechanism (which is known to be strategyproof) provides a $2^{1-\frac{1}{p}}$ approximation ratio, and that is the optimal approximation ratio among all deterministic strategyproof mechanisms. For randomized mechanisms, we present two results. First, we present a negative result: we show that for integer $\infty>p>2$, no mechanism---from a rather large class of randomized mechanisms--- has an approximation ratio better than that of the median mechanism. This is in contrast to the case of $p=2$ and $p=\infty$ where a randomized mechanism provably helps improve the worst case approximation ratio. Second, for the case of 2 agents, we show that a mechanism called LRM, first designed by Procaccia and Tennenholtz for the special case of $L_{\infty}$, provides the optimal approximation ratio among all randomized mechanisms.

Characterization of Group-strategyproof Mechanisms for Facility Location in Strictly Convex Space

Group-Strategyproof mechanisms for facility location with Euclidean distance.

Strategy-proof Mechanism Design for Facility Location Games: Revisited (extended Abstract)

Approximation strategy-proof mechanisms for obnoxious facility location on a line

Strategy-Proof Mechanism For Obnoxious Facility Location On A Line

Mechanisms For Obnoxious Facility Game On A Path

Strategy-proof Approximation Mechanisms for an Obnoxious Facility Game on Networks.

Two-Facility Location Games with a Minimum Distance Requirement on a Circle.

Strategy-proof Mechanisms for Obnoxious Facility Game with Bounded Service Range

Facility Location Games with Distinct Desires

Mechanism Design for One-Facility Location Game with Obnoxious Effects.

Mechanism Design for Facility Location Games with Candidate Locations

Facility Location Games with Thresholds

Strategyproof Mechanisms For Group-Fair Facility Location Problems

Strategy-Proof Facility Location for Concave Cost Functions

Design and Characterization of Strategy-Proof Mechanisms for Two-Facility Game on a Line

Constrained heterogeneous two-facility location games with sum-variant

Approximately Optimal Mechanisms for Strategyproof Facility Location: Minimizing $L_p$ Norm of Costs

Tighter Bounds for Facility Games

Facility Location Games with Externalities

Constrained Heterogeneous Two-facility Location Games with Max-variant Cost