Abstract:Advances in DNA sequencing technologies have enabled large cancer sequencing studies, collecting somatic mutation data from a large number of cancer patients. One of the main goals of these studies is the identification of all cancer genes--genes associated with cancer. Its achievement is complicated by the extensive mutational heterogeneity of cancer, due to the fact that important mutations in cancer target combinations of genes (i.e., pathways). Recently, the pattern of mutual exclusivity among mutations in a cancer pathway has been observed, and methods that find significant combinations of cancer genes by detecting mutual exclusivity have been proposed. A key question in the analysis of mutual exclusivity is the computation of the minimum number of samples required to reliably find a meaningful set of mutually exclusive mutations in the data, or conclude that there is no such set. In general, the problem of determining the sample complexity, or the number of samples required to identify significant combinations of features, of genomic problems is largely unexplored. In this work we propose a framework to analyze the sample complexity of problems that arise in the study of genomic datasets. Our framework is based on tools from combinatorial analysis and statistical learning theory that have been used for the analysis of machine learning and probably approximately correct (PAC) learning. We use our framework to analyze the problem of the identification of cancer pathways through mutual exclusivity analysis. We analytically derive matching upper and lower bounds on the sample complexity of the problem, showing that sample sizes much larger than currently available may be required to identify all the cancer genes in a pathway. We also provide two algorithms to find a cancer pathway from a large genomic dataset. On simulated and cancer data, we show that our algorithms can be used to identify cancer pathways from large genomic datasets.

A Greedy Algorithm For Detecting Mutually Exclusive Patterns In Cancer Mutation Data

An Accurate Algorithm for Identifying Mutually Exclusive Patterns on Multiple Sets of Genomic Mutations

A Greedy Approach for Mutual Exclusivity Analysis in Cancer Study.

A Forward Selection Algorithm to Identify Mutually Exclusive Alterations in Cancer Studies

Identifying mutual exclusivity across cancer genomes: computational approaches to discover genetic interaction and reveal tumor vulnerability.

A Weighted Exact Test for Mutually Exclusive Mutations in Cancer

Integrated Multi‐omics Data Analyses for Exploring the Co‐occurring and Mutually Exclusive Gene Alteration Events in Colorectal Cancer

WeSME: uncovering mutual exclusivity of cancer drivers and beyond

A Cancer Gene Selection Algorithm Based on the K-S Test and CFS

An Entropy-Based Method for Identifying Mutual Exclusive Driver Genes in Cancer

TiMEx: A Waiting Time Model for Mutually Exclusive Groups of Cancer Alterations

On the Sample Complexity of Cancer Pathways Identification

Prediction of Driver Modules Via Balancing Exclusive Coverages of Mutations in Cancer Samples.

Efficient algorithms to discover alterations with complementary functional association in cancer

Identification of driver pathways in cancer based on combinatorial patterns of somatic gene mutations.

Identifying Candidate Cancer Genes by Finding Co-Occurring Mutations in Cancer Mutation Profiles

An Effective Method to Identify Cooperation Driver Gene Sets

An exact method to compute a $p$-value for the beyond-pairwise correlations among cancer gene mutations

Nature-Inspired Multiobjective Cancer Subtype Diagnosis.

A novel network regularized matrix decomposition method to detect mutated cancer genes in tumour samples with inter-patient heterogeneity