Spatial Distribution and Hazard of Halogenated Flame Retardants and Polychlorinated Biphenyls to Common Kingfisher (alcedo Atthis) from a Region of South China Affected by Electronic Waste Recycling

Ying Peng,Jiangping Wu,Xiaojun Luo,Xiaowei Zhang,John P. Giesy,Bixian Mai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.104952
IF: 11.8
2019-01-01
Environment International
Abstract:Numerous studies have reported bioaccumulation of halogenated flame retardants (HFRs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in wildlife from electronic waste (e-waste) recycling sites. However, the concentrations and hazards of HFRs and PCBs in wildlife from non-e-waste sites which were not involved in any known e-waste recycling activities in the e-waste-impacted region are still unclear. Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), alternative HFRs (AHFRs; including dechlorane plus, decabromodiphenyl ethane, and 1,2-bis(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy) ethane), and PCBs were quantified in common kingfishers (Alcedo atthis) from a region affected by e-waste recycling in South China, and potential adverse effects were evaluated. Concentrations of Sigma PBDEs and Sigma PCBs in kingfishers ranged from 2.1 x 10(3)-1.3 x 10(5) ng/g lipid mass (lm) and 2.1 x 10(3)-1.5 x 10(6) ng/g lm, respectively. At e-waste recycling sites, these concentrations were 100- to 1000-fold greater than those in kingfishers from non-e-waste areas, where concentrations of Sigma PBDEs and Sigma PCBs were 16-1.2 x 10(3) and 39-3.0 x 10(3) ng/g lm, respectively. Concentrations of Sigma AHFRs in kingfishers from e-waste sites and non-e-waste sites ranged from 8.5 to 3.6 x 10(2) and 0.8-2.9 x 10(2) ng/g lm, respectively. The greatest concentrations of PCBs in kingfishers were measured from the e-waste sites. Additionally, kingfishers from four non-e-waste sites in the vicinity of e-waste sites had greater PCB concentrations compared to the other six non-e-waste sites. Concentrations of AHFRs were negatively and significantly correlated with distance from an e-waste site, which indicated that AHFRs from non-e-waste sites might be influenced by point sources. Further, a significant (r(2) = 0.53, p = 0.02) positive correlation between human population density and concentrations of Sigma PBDEs in kingfishers from non-e-waste sites was observed. Concentrations of either PBDEs or PCBs from e-waste sites might pose severe, adverse reproductive effects to kingfishers, while the potential for adverse effects of PBDEs and PCBs to kingfishers from most non-e-waste sites seemed minimal.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?