DPPA2/4 and SUMO E3 Ligase PIAS4 Opposingly Regulate Zygotic Transcriptional Program

Yao-Long Yan,Chao Zhang,Jing Hao,Xue-Lian Wang,Jia Ming,Li Mi,Jie Na,Xinli Hu,Yangming Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000324

IF: 9.8

2019-01-01

PLoS Biology

Abstract:[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000324.].

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Sumoylation Activates The Transcriptional Activity Of Pax-6, An Important Transcription Factor For Eye And Brain Development

Qin Yan, Lili Gong, Mi Deng, Lan Zhang, Shuming Sun, Jiao Liu, Haili Ma, Dan Yuan, Pei-Chao Chen, Xiaohui Hu, Jinping Liu, Jichao Qin, Ling Xiao, Xiao-Qin Huang, Jian Zhang, David Wan-Cheng Li*

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007866107

2010-01-01

Abstract:Pax-6 is an evolutionarily conserved transcription factor regulating brain and eye development. Four Pax-6 isoforms have been reported previously. Although the longer Pax-6 isoforms (p46 and p48) bear two DNA-binding domains, the paired domain (PD) and the homeodomain (HD), the shorter Pax-6 isoform p32 contains only the HD for DNA binding. Although a third domain, the proline-, serine and threonine-enriched activation (PST) domain, in the C termini of all Pax-6 isoforms mediates their transcriptional modulation via phosphorylation, how p32 Pax-6 could regulate target genes remains to be elucidated. In the present study, we show that sumoylation at K91 is required for p32 Pax-6 to bind to a HD-specific site and regulate expression of target genes. First, in vitro-synthesized p32 Pax-6 alone cannot bind the P3 sequence, which contains the HD recognition site, unless it is preincubated with nuclear extracts precleared by anti-Pax-6 but not by anti-small ubiquitin-related modifier 1 (anti-SUMO1) antibody. Second, in vitro-synthesized p32 Pax-6 can be sumoylated by SUMO1, and the sumoylated p32 Pax-6 then can bind to the P3 sequence. Third, Pax-6 and SUMO1 are colocalized in the embryonic optic and lens vesicles and can be coimmunoprecipitated. Finally, SUMO1-conjugated p32 Pax-6 exists in both the nucleus and cytoplasm, and sumoylation significantly enhances the DNA-binding ability of p32 Pax-6 and positively regulates gene expression. Together, our results demonstrate that sumoylation activates p32 Pax-6 in both DNA-binding and transcriptional activities. In addition, our studies demonstrate that p32 and p46 Pax-6 possess differential DNA-binding and regulatory activities.
Transcriptional Regulation of Pp2a-A Alpha is Mediated by Multiple Factors Including Ap-2 Alpha, Creb, Ets-1, and Sp-1

He-Ge Chen,Wen-Jun Han,Mi Deng,Jichao Qin,Dan Yuan,Jin-Ping Liu,Ling Xiao,Lili Gong,Songping Liang,Jian Zhang,Yun Liu,David Wan-Cheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007019

IF: 3.7

2009-01-01

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Protein phosphatases-2A (PP-2A) is a major serine/threonine phosphatase and accounts for more than 50% serine/threonine phosphatase activity in eukaryotes. The holoenzyme of PP-2A consists of the scaffold A subunit, the catalytic C subunit and the regulatory B subunit. The scaffold subunits, PP2A-A alpha/beta, provide a platform for both C and B subunits to bind, thus playing a crucial role in providing specific PP-2A activity. Mutation of the two genes encoding PP2A-A alpha/beta leads to carcinogenesis and likely other human diseases. Regulation of these genes by various factors, both extracellular and intracellular, remains largely unknown. In the present study, we have conducted functional dissection of the promoter of the mouse PP2A-A alpha gene. Our results demonstrate that the proximal promoter of the mouse PP2A-A alpha gene contains numerous cis-elements for the binding of CREB, ETS-1, AP-2 alpha, SP-1 besides the putative TFIIB binding site (BRE) and the downstream promoter element (DPE). Gel mobility shifting assays revealed that CREB, ETS-1, AP-2 alpha, and SP-1 all bind to PP2A-A alpha gene promoter. In vitro mutagenesis and reporter gene activity assays reveal that while SP-1 displays negative regulation, CREB, ETS-1 and AP-2A alpha all positively regulate the promoter of the PP2A-A alpha gene. ChIP assays further confirm that all the above transcription factors participate the regulation of PP2A-A alpha gene promoter. Together, our results reveal that multiple transcription factors regulate the PP2A-A alpha gene.
Binding by the Polycomb Complex Component BMI1 and H2A Monoubiquitination Shape Local and Long-Range Interactions in the Arabidopsis Genome.

Xiaochang Yin,Francisco J. Romero-Campero,Minqi Yang,Fernando Baile,Yuxin Cao,Jiayue Shu,Lingxiao Luo,Dingyue Wang,Shang Sun,Peng Yan,Zhiyun Gong,Xiaorong Mo,Genji Qin,Myriam Calonje,Yue Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koad112

2023-01-01

Abstract:Three-dimensional (3D) chromatin organization is highly dynamic during development and seems to play a crucial role in regulating gene expression. Self-interacting domains, commonly called topologically associating domains (TADs) or compartment domains (CDs), have been proposed as the basic structural units of chromatin organization. Surprisingly, although these units have been found in several plant species, they escaped detection in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Here, we show that the Arabidopsis genome is partitioned into contiguous CDs with different epigenetic features, which are required to maintain appropriate intra-CD and long-range interactions. Consistent with this notion, the histone-modifying Polycomb group machinery is involved in 3D chromatin organization. Yet, while it is clear that Polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2)-mediated trimethylation of histone H3 on lysine 27 (H3K27me3) helps establish local and long-range chromatin interactions in plants, the implications of PRC1-mediated histone H2A monoubiquitination on lysine 121 (H2AK121ub) are unclear. We found that PRC1, together with PRC2, maintains intra-CD interactions, but it also hinders the formation of H3K4me3-enriched local chromatin loops when acting independently of PRC2. Moreover, the loss of PRC1 or PRC2 activity differentially affects long-range chromatin interactions, and these 3D changes differentially affect gene expression. Our results suggest that H2AK121ub helps prevent the formation of transposable element/H3K27me1-rich long loops and serves as a docking point for H3K27me3 incorporation.
The Zscan4-Tet2 Transcription Nexus Regulates Metabolic Rewiring and Enhances Proteostasis to Promote Reprogramming.

Zhou-Li Cheng,Meng-Li Zhang,Huai-Peng Lin,Chao Gao,Jun-Bin Song,Zhihong Zheng,Linpeng Li,Yanan Zhang,Xiaoqi Shen,Hao Zhang,Zhenghui Huang,Wuqiang Zhan,Cheng Zhang,Xu Hu,Yi-Ping Sun,Lubing Jiang,Lei Sun,Yanhui Xu,Chen Yang,Yuanlong Ge,Yong Zhao,Xingguo Liu,Hui Yang,Pengyuan Liu,Xing Guo,Kun-Liang Guan,Yue Xiong,Mingliang Zhang,Dan Ye

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107877

IF: 8.8

2020-01-01

Cell Reports

Abstract:Evolutionarily conserved SCAN (named after SRE-ZBP, CTfin51, AW-1, and Number 18 cDNA)-domain-containing zinc finger transcription factors (ZSCAN) have been found in both mouse and human genomes. Zscan4 is transiently expressed during zygotic genome activation (ZGA) in preimplantation embryos and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) reprogramming. However, little is known about the mechanism of Zscan4 underlying these processes of cell fate control. Here, we show that Zscan4f, a representative of ZSCAN proteins, is able to recruit Tet2 through its SCAN domain. The Zscan4f-Tet2 interaction promotes DNA demethylation and regulates the expression of target genes, particularly those encoding glycolytic enzymes and proteasome subunits. Zscan4f regulates metabolic rewiring, enhances proteasome function, and ultimately promotes iPSC generation. These results identify Zscan4f as an important partner of Tet2 in regulating target genes and promoting iPSC generation and suggest a possible and common mechanism shared by SCAN family transcription factors to recruit ten-eleven translocation (TET) DNA dioxygenases to regulate diverse cellular processes, including reprogramming.
The SUMO ligase Su(var)2-10 links piRNA-guided target recognition to chromatin silencing

Maria Ninova,Yung-Chia Ariel Chen,Baira Godneeva,Alicia K. Rogers,Yicheng Luo,Alexei A. Aravin,Katalin Fejes Tóth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/533091

2019-01-29

Abstract:Abstract Regulation of transcription is the main mechanism responsible for precise control of gene expression. While the majority of transcriptional regulation is mediated by a multitude of DNA-binding transcription factors that bind to regulatory gene regions, an elegant alternative strategy employs small RNA guides, piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) to identify targets of transcriptional repression. Here we show that in Drosophila the small ubiquitin-like protein SUMO and the SUMO E3 ligase Su(var)2-10 are required for piRNA-guided deposition of repressive chromatin marks and transcriptional silencing of piRNA targets. Su(var)2-10 links the piRNA-guided target recognition complex to the silencing effector by binding the piRNA/Piwi complex and inducing SUMO-dependent recruitment of the SetDB1/Wde histone methyltransferase effector. We propose that in Drosophila, the nuclear piRNA pathway has co-opted a conserved mechanism of SUMO-dependent recruitment of the SetDB1/Wde chromatin modifier to confer repression of genomic parasites. Highlights - piRNA-induced transposon silencing requires SUMO and the SUMO E3 ligase Su(var)2-10 - Su(var)2-10 links the target recognition complex to the silencing effector - Su(var)2-10 binds the piRNA-guided target recognition complex and deposits SUMO on target chromatin - Su(var)2-10 induces SUMO-dependent recruitment of the SetDB1/Wde histone methyltransferase to target loci
SUMO modification regulates the transcriptional activity of XBP1.

Hui Chen,Ling Qi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20100193

IF: 3.766

2010-01-01

Biochemical Journal

Abstract:The UPR (unfolded protein response), a cellular defence mechanism against misfolded protein accumulation in the ER (endoplasmic reticulum), is associated with many human diseases such as aging, cancer and diabetes. XBP1 (X-box-binding protein 1), a key transcription factor of the UPR, is critical in maintaining ER homoeostasis. Nevertheless, the mechanism by which XBP1 transcriptional activity is regulated remains unexplored. In the present study we show that XBP1s, the active spliced form of XBP1 protein, is SUMOylated, mainly by PIAS2 [protein inhibitor of activated STAT (signal transducer and activator of transcription) 2] at two lysine residues located in the C-terminal transactivation domain. Ablation of these SUMOylation events significantly enhances the transcriptional activity of XBP1s towards UPR target genes. Thus our results reveal an unexpected role for SUMO (small ubiquitin-related modifier) in the regulation of UPR activation and ER homoeostasis.
p300/CBP-catalyzed acetylation safeguards minor zygotic genome activation via activating DUX

Lieying Xiao,Hao Jin,Yanna Dang,Panpan Zhao,Shuang Li,Yan Shi,Shaohua Wang,Kun Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.27.625783

2024-11-28

Abstract:Zygotic genome activation (ZGA), the first transcriptional event at the onset of life, is crucial for early embryonic development. However, the mechanisms that initiate and regulate ZGA in mammals remain poorly understood. In this study, we demonstrate that p300/CBP-catalyzed acetylation plays a vital role in regulating ZGA. Inhibition of p300/CBP acetyltransferase activity results in impaired minor ZGA and a subsequent 2-cell arrest. By profiling the dynamic landscape of p300 during the ZGA stage, we elucidate the distinct patterns of p300 establishment in promoter and enhancer regions. Moreover, p300 recruits RNA polymerase (Pol II) to pre-configure in the promoter regions of ZGA genes, and orchestrates the gradual establishment of enhancer activity during the early 2-cell stage to activate ZGA. Furthermore, p300 enhances minor ZGA by promoting the expression of DUX. Restoring DUX levels, which are diminished due to p300/CBP inhibition, rescues ZGA and embryonic development by re-establishing Pol II enrichment on minor ZGA genes. Overall, our findings elucidate the mechanism by which p300/CBP regulates ZGA through acetylation and activation of the key transcription factor DUX.

Developmental Biology
A positive role for polycomb in transcriptional regulation via H4K20me1

Xiangdong Lv,Zhijun Han,Hao Chen,Bo Yang,Xiaofeng Yang,Yuanxin Xia,Chenyu Pan,Lin Fu,Shuo Zhang,Hui Han,Min Wu,Zhaocai Zhou,Lei Zhang,Lin Li,Gang Wei,Yun Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2016.33

Abstract:The highly conserved polycomb group (PcG) proteins maintain heritable transcription repression of the genes essential for development from fly to mammals. However, sporadic reports imply a potential role of PcGs in positive regulation of gene transcription, although systematic investigation of such function and the underlying mechanism has rarely been reported. Here, we report a Pc-mediated, H3K27me3-dependent positive transcriptional regulation of Senseless (Sens), a key transcription factor required for development. Mechanistic studies show that Pc regulates Sens expression by promoting H4K20me1 at the Sens locus. Further bioinformatic analysis at genome-wide level indicates that the existence of H4K20me1 acts as a selective mark for positive transcriptional regulation by Pc/H3K27me3. Both the intensities and specific patterns of Pc and H3K27me3 are important for the fates of target gene transcription. Moreover, binding of transcription factor Broad (Br), which physically interacts with Pc and positively regulates the transcription of Sens, is observed in Pc(+)H3K27me3(+)H4K20me1(+) genes, but not in Pc(+)H3K27me3(+)H4K20me1(-) genes. Taken together, our study reveals that, coupling with the transcription factor Br, Pc positively regulates transcription of Pc(+)H3K27me3(+)H4K20me1(+) genes in developing Drosophila wing disc.
ZFP541 maintains the repression of pre-pachytene transcriptional programs and promotes male meiosis progression

Jianze Xu,Jianing Gao,Junyan Liu,Xue Huang,Huan Zhang,Ao Ma,Jingwei Ye,Xingxia Zhang,Yang Li,Gang Yang,Hao Yin,Ranjha Khan,Tao Li,Suixing Fan,Xiaohua Jiang,Yuanwei Zhang,Hanwei Jiang,Hui Ma,Qinghua Shi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110540

IF: 8.8

2022-03-01

Cell Reports

Abstract:The DSB machinery, which induces the programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the leptotene and zygotene stages during meiosis, is suppressed before the onset of the pachytene stage. However, the biological significance and underlying mechanisms remain largely unclear. Here, we report that ZFP541 is indispensable for the suppression of DSB formation after mid-pachytene. The deletion of Zfp541 in mice causes the aberrant recruitment of DSB machinery to chromosome axes and generation of massive DSBs in late pachytene and diplotene spermatocytes, leading to meiotic arrest at the diplotene stage. Integrated analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) sequencing data indicate that ZFP541 predominantly binds to promoters of pre-pachytene genes, including meiotic DSB formation-related genes (e.g., Prdm9 and Mei1) and their upstream activators (e.g., Meiosin and Rxra), and maintains their repression in pachytene spermatocytes. Our results reveal that ZFP541 functions as a transcriptional regulator in pachytene spermatocytes, orchestrating the transcriptome to ensure meiosis progression.

cell biology
Regulation of the Drosophila transcriptome by Pumilio and the CCR4-NOT deadenylase complex

Rebecca J. Haugen,Catherine Barnier,Nathan D. Elrod,Hua Luo,Madeline K. Jensen,Ping Ji,Craig A. Smibert,Howard D. Lipshitz,Eric J. Wagner,P. Lydia Freddolino,Aaron C. Goldstrohm

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.079813.123

2024-04-16

RNA

Abstract:The sequence-specific RNA-binding protein Pumilio controls Drosophila development; however, the network of mRNAs that it regulates remains incompletely characterized. In this study, we utilize knockdown and knockout approaches coupled with RNA-Seq to measure the impact of Pumilio on the transcriptome of Drosophila cells in culture. We also use an improved RNA co-immunoprecipitation method to identify Pumilio-bound mRNAs in Drosophila embryos. Integration of these datasets with the locations of Pumilio binding motifs across the transcriptome reveal novel direct Pumilio target genes involved in neural, muscle, wing, and germ cell development, and cellular proliferation. These genes include components of Wnt, TGF-beta, MAPK/ERK, and Notch signaling pathways, DNA replication, and lipid metabolism. We identify the mRNAs regulated by the CCR4-NOT deadenylase complex, a key factor in Pumilio-mediated repression, and observe concordant regulation of Pumilio:CCR4-NOT target mRNAs. Computational modeling reveals that Pumilio binding, binding site number, clustering, and sequence context are important determinants of regulation. In contrast, we show that the responses of direct mRNA targets to Pumilio-mediated repression are not influenced by their content of optimal synonymous codons. Moreover, contrary to a prevailing model, we do not detect a role for CCR4-NOT in the degradation of mRNAs with low codon optimality. Together, the results of this work provide new insights into the Pumilio regulatory network and mechanisms, and the parameters that influence the efficacy of Pumilio-mediated regulation.

biochemistry & molecular biology
SUMO engages multiple corepressors to regulate chromatin structure and transcription

Jian Ouyang,Grace Gill

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.4.7.9807

2009-10-01

Epigenetics

Abstract:Post-translational modification of many transcription factors and cofactors by the small ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO has been correlated with transcriptional repression. Recent investigations of the molecular mechanisms underlying SUMO-dependent repression have identified diverse chromatin modifying enzymes and chromatin associated proteins as effectors of SUMO-dependent changes in chromatin structure and gene expression. A surprising diversity of proteins has been identified to be recruited to promoters in a SUMO-dependent manner, including the histone deacetylase HDAC2, the histone demethylase LSD1, the histone methyltransferase SETDB1, the nucleosome remodeling ATPase Mi-2, and chromatin-associated proteins HP1 and L3MBTL1 and L3MBTL2. These findings suggest that SUMOylation plays a central role in coordinating histone modifications and chromatin structure important for regulation of gene expression.
SUMO paralogue–specific functions revealed through systematic analysis of human knockout cell lines and gene expression data

Danielle Bouchard,Wei Wang,Wei-Chih Yang,Shuying He,Anthony Garcia,Michael J. Matunis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e21-01-0031

2021-09-01

Molecular Biology of the Cell

Abstract:Analysis of SUMO1 and SUMO2 knockout cells reveals unique functions for SUMO paralogues in regulating cellular morphology, PML nuclear body structure, responses to proteotoxic and genotoxic stress, and control of gene expression. Findings reveal nonredundant regulatory roles for SUMO1 and SUMO2 and a basis for more precise SUMO-targeting therapies.

cell biology
Reversible regulation of ORC2 SUMOylation by PIAS4 and SENP2

Ronghua Wang,Fangming Liu,Yongxu Zhao,Dan Wu,Lihan Chen,Edward T.H. Yeh,Chao Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19594

2017-07-26

Oncotarget

Abstract:The small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) system is essential for smooth progression of cell cycle at the G2/M phase. Many centromeric proteins are reversibly SUMOylated to ensure proper chromosome segregation at the mitosis. SUMOylation of centromeric Origin Recognition Complex subunit 2 (ORC2) at the G2/M phase is essential in maintaining genome integrity. However, how ORC2 SUMOylation is regulated remains largely unclear. Here we show that ORC2 SUMOylation is reversibly controlled by SUMO E3 ligase PIAS4 and De-SUMOylase SENP2. Either depletion of PIAS4 or overexpression of SENP2 eliminated SUMOylation of ORC2 at the G/M phase and consequently resulted in abnormal centromeric histone H3 lysine 4 methylation. Cells stably expressing SENP2 protein or small interfering RNA for PIAS4 bypassed mitosis and endoreduplicated their genome to become polyploidy. Furthermore, percentage of polyploid cells is reduced after coexpression of ORC2-SUMO2 fusion protein. Thus, the proper regulation of ORC2 SUMOylation at the G2/M phase by PIAS4 and SENP2 is critical for smooth progression of the mitotic cycle of cells.
SUMO Modification Reverses Inhibitory Effects of Smad Nuclear Interacting Protein-1 in TGF-β Responses*

Sisi Liu,Jianyin Long,Bo Yuan,Mingjie Zheng,Mu Xiao,Jianming Xu,Xia Lin,Xin-Hua Feng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m116.755850

IF: 5.485

2016-01-01

Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract:SNIP1 (Smad nuclear interacting protein 1) is a transcription repressor for the TGF-β and NF-κB signaling pathways through disrupting the recruitment of co-activator p300. However, it is unclear how the functions of SNIP1 in the TGF-β signaling pathway are controlled. Our present studies show that SNIP1 is covalently modified by small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) in vitro and in vivo at three lysine sites: Lys5, Lys30, and Lys108, with Lys30 being the major SUMO modification site. SUMOylation of SNIP1 is enhanced by SUMO E3 ligase PIAS proteins and inhibited by SUMO proteases SENP1/2. Furthermore, we find that SUMOylation of SNIP1 attenuates its inhibitory effect in TGF-β signaling because the SUMO-conjugated form of SNIP1 exhibits impaired ability to disrupt the formation of Smad complex and the interaction between p300 and Smads. Subsequently, SUMOylation of SNIP1 leads to the loss of SNIP1-mediated inhibition on expression of the TGF-β target genes PAI-1 and MMP2 and eventually enhances TGF-β-regulated cell migration and invasion.
Dynamic Ubiquitylation of Sox2 Regulates Proteostasis and Governs Neural Progenitor Cell Differentiation

Chun-Ping Cui,Yuan Zhang,Chanjuan Wang,Fang Yuan,Hongchang Li,Yuying Yao,Yuhan Chen,Chunnan Li,Wenyi Wei,Cui Hua Liu,Fuchu He,Yan Liu,Lingqiang Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07025-z

IF: 16.6

2018-01-01

Nature Communications

Abstract:The original version of this Article contained an error in Figure 7. In panel c, the lanes of the western blots were incorrectly labelled '+/+ +/+ -/- -/- +/+ +/+ -/- -/-'. This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
RNA Helicase DDX5 Inhibits Reprogramming to Pluripotency by Mirna-Based Repression of RYBP and Its PRC1-Dependent and -Independent Functions

Huanhuan Li,Ping Lai,Jinping Jia,Yawei Song,Qing Xia,Kaimeng Huang,Na He,Wangfang Ping,Jiayu Chen,Zhongzhou Yang,Jiao Li,Mingze Yao,Xiaotao Dong,Jicheng Zhao,Chunhui Hou,Miguel A. Esteban,Shaorong Gao,Duanqing Pei,Andrew P. Hutchins,Hongjie Yao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2016.12.002

IF: 23.9

2017-01-01

Cell Stem Cell

Abstract:RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), in addition to their functions in cellular homeostasis, play important roles in lineage specification and maintaining cellular identity. Despite their diverse and essential functions, which touch on nearly all aspects of RNA metabolism, the roles of RBPs in somatic cell reprogramming are poorly understood. Here we show that the DEAD-box RBP DDX5 inhibits reprogramming by repressing the expression and function of the non-canonical polycomb complex 1 (PRC1) subunit RYBP. Disrupting Ddx5 expression improves the efficiency of iPSC generation and impedes processing of miR-125b, leading to Rybp upregulation and suppression of lineage-specific genes via RYBP-dependent ubiquitination of H2AK119. Furthermore, RYBP is required for PRC1-independent recruitment of OCT4 to the promoter of Kdm2b, a histone demethylase gene that promotes reprogramming by reactivating endogenous pluripotency genes. Together, these results reveal important functions of DDX5 in regulating reprogramming and highlight the importance of a Ddx5-miR125b-Rybp axis in controlling cell fate.
SUMOylation at K707 of DGCR8 Controls Direct Function of Primary Microrna.

Changhong Zhu,Cheng Chen,Jian Huang,Hailong Zhang,Xian Zhao,Rong Deng,Jinzhuo Dou,Hui Jin,Ran Chen,Ming Xu,Qin Chen,Yanli Wang,Jianxiu Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv741

IF: 14.9

2015-01-01

Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract:DGCR8 (DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 8) is essential for primary microRNA (pri-miRNA) processing in the cell nucleus. It specifically combines with Drosha, a nuclear RNase III enzyme, to form the Microprocessor complex (MC) that cleaves pri-miRNA to precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA), which is further processed to mature miRNA by Dicer, a cytoplasmic RNase III enzyme. Increasing evidences suggest that pri-/pre-miRNAs have direct functions in regulation of gene expression, however the underlying mechanism how it is fine-tuned remains unclear. Here we find that DGCR8 is modified by SUMO1 at the major site K(707), which can be promoted by its ERK-activated phosphorylation. SUMOylation of DGCR8 enhances the protein stability by preventing the degradation via the ubiquitin proteasome pathway. More importantly, SUMOylation of DGCR8 does not alter its association with Drosha, the MC activity and miRNA biogenesis, but rather influences its affinity with pri-miRNAs. This altered affinity of DGCR8 with pri-miRNAs seems to control the direct functions of pri-miRNAs in recognition and repression of the target mRNAs, which is evidently linked to the DGCR8 function in regulation of tumorigenesis and cell migration. Collectively, our data suggest a novel mechanism that SUMOylation of DGCR8 controls direct functions of pri-miRNAs in gene silencing.
SUMO-mediated regulation of a H3K4me3 reader controls germline development in

Cátia A. Carvalho,Ulrike Bening Abu-Shach,Asha Raju,Zlata Vershinin,Dan Levy,Mike Boxem,Limor Broday

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.27.582283

2024-02-28

Abstract:ULP-2 is a conserved SUMO protease required for embryonic development in . Here we revealed that ULP-2 controls germline development by regulating the PHD-SET domain protein, SET-26. Specifically, the mutant hermaphrodites exhibit increased sterility and progressive elevation in global protein sumoylation. In the progeny of homozygous animals, meiosis is arrested at the diplotene stage and the cells in the proximal germline acquire a somatic fate. Germline RNAseq analysis revealed the downregulation of numerous germline genes, whereas somatic gene expression is upregulated in mutant gonads. To determine the key factors that are regulated by ULP-2, we performed a yeast two-hybrid screen and identified the H3K4me3 reader, SET-26. Genetic interaction was observed in double mutant ; resulting in enhanced sterility phenotype to complete sterility in the first generation of homozygous offspring. Consistently, SET-26 is sumoylated and its sumoylation levels are regulated by ULP-2. Moreover, we detected reduction in H3K4me3 levels bound to SET-26 in the mutant background. A comparative proteomics screen between WT and loss of activity identified the predicted methyltransferase SET-27 as a ULP-2-dependent SET-26-associated protein. SET-27 knockout genetically interacts with ULP-2 in the germline, but not with SET-26. Taken together, we revealed a ULP-2/SET-26 axis which is required for the maintenance and regulation of germline development.

Cell Biology
Regulators of alternative polyadenylation operate at the transition from mitosis to meiosis

Lingjuan Shan,Chan Wu,Di Chen,Lei Hou,Xin Li,Lixia Wang,Xiao Chu,Yifeng Hou,Zhaohui Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2016.12.007

IF: 5.723

2017-01-01

Journal of Genetics and Genomics

Abstract:In the sexually reproductive organisms, gametes are produced by meiosis following a limited mitotic amplification. However, the intrinsic program switching cells from mitotic to meiotic cycle is unclear. Alternative polyadenylation (APA) is a highly conserved means of gene regulation and is achieved by the RNA 3′-processing machinery to generate diverse 3′UTR profiles. In Drosophila spermatogenesis, we observed distinct profiles of transcriptome-wide 3′UTR between mitotic and meiotic cells. In mutant germ cells stuck in mitosis, 3′UTRs of hundreds of genes were consistently shifted. Remarkably, altering the levels of multiple 3′-processing factors disrupted germline's progression to meiosis, indicative of APA's active role in this transition. An RNA-binding protein (RBP) Tut could directly bind 3′UTRs of 3′-processing factors whose expressions were repressed in the presence of Tut-containing complex. Further, we demonstrated that this RBP complex could execute the repression post-transcriptionally by recruiting CCR4/Twin of deadenylation complex. Thus, we propose that an RBP complex regulates the dynamic APA profile to promote the mitosis-to-meiosis transition.
Regulation of Smad4 Sumoylation and Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling by Protein Inhibitor of Activated STAT1

Min Liang,Frauke Melchior,Xin-Hua Feng,Xia Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M401554200

IF: 5.485

2004-01-01

Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract:The tumor suppressor, Smad4/DPC4, is a common signal transducer in transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling. In this study, we demonstrated that the protein inhibitor of activated STAT1 (PIAS1) regulates the signaling potential of Smad4 through a sumoylation-dependent mechanism. PIAS1 was shown to be an E3 ligase for Smad4 sumoylation in vitro and in vivo. PIAS1 physically interacted with Smad4 in a TGF-β-inducible manner. A minimal SUMO E3 ligase domain and Smad4-binding domain were defined on PIAS1 protein. The RING finger domain of PIAS1 was essential for its E3 ligase function. Although PIAS1 enhanced the Smad4-dependent transcriptional activation of TGF-β signaling, a mutant lacking the RING domain inhibited the sumoylation of Smad4 in a dominant negative manner and, as a result, abolished the transcriptional response of TGF-β. These data demonstrate that PIAS1 protein positively modulates TGF-β responses as a SUMO E3 ligase for Smad4.

DPPA2/4 and SUMO E3 Ligase PIAS4 Opposingly Regulate Zygotic Transcriptional Program

Sumoylation Activates The Transcriptional Activity Of Pax-6, An Important Transcription Factor For Eye And Brain Development

Transcriptional Regulation of Pp2a-A Alpha is Mediated by Multiple Factors Including Ap-2 Alpha, Creb, Ets-1, and Sp-1

Binding by the Polycomb Complex Component BMI1 and H2A Monoubiquitination Shape Local and Long-Range Interactions in the Arabidopsis Genome.

The Zscan4-Tet2 Transcription Nexus Regulates Metabolic Rewiring and Enhances Proteostasis to Promote Reprogramming.

The SUMO ligase Su(var)2-10 links piRNA-guided target recognition to chromatin silencing

SUMO modification regulates the transcriptional activity of XBP1.

p300/CBP-catalyzed acetylation safeguards minor zygotic genome activation via activating DUX

A positive role for polycomb in transcriptional regulation via H4K20me1

ZFP541 maintains the repression of pre-pachytene transcriptional programs and promotes male meiosis progression

Regulation of the Drosophila transcriptome by Pumilio and the CCR4-NOT deadenylase complex

SUMO engages multiple corepressors to regulate chromatin structure and transcription

SUMO paralogue–specific functions revealed through systematic analysis of human knockout cell lines and gene expression data

Reversible regulation of ORC2 SUMOylation by PIAS4 and SENP2

SUMO Modification Reverses Inhibitory Effects of Smad Nuclear Interacting Protein-1 in TGF-β Responses*

Dynamic Ubiquitylation of Sox2 Regulates Proteostasis and Governs Neural Progenitor Cell Differentiation

RNA Helicase DDX5 Inhibits Reprogramming to Pluripotency by Mirna-Based Repression of RYBP and Its PRC1-Dependent and -Independent Functions

SUMOylation at K707 of DGCR8 Controls Direct Function of Primary Microrna.

SUMO-mediated regulation of a H3K4me3 reader controls germline development in

Regulators of alternative polyadenylation operate at the transition from mitosis to meiosis

Regulation of Smad4 Sumoylation and Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling by Protein Inhibitor of Activated STAT1