Joint Full-Waveform Inversion for Velocity Model Building: A Real Case Study in the Viscoacoustic Approximation
Wei Zhou,Romain Brossier,Jean Virieux,Pengliang Yang,Stephane Operto
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017-17734253.1
2017-01-01
Abstract:PreviousNext No AccessSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017Joint full-waveform inversion for velocity model building: A real case study in the viscoacoustic approximationAuthors: Wei ZhouRomain BrossierJean VirieuxPengliang YangStephane OpertoWei ZhouUniversité Grenoble AlpesSearch for more papers by this author, Romain BrossierUniversité Grenoble AlpesSearch for more papers by this author, Jean VirieuxUniversité Grenoble AlpesSearch for more papers by this author, Pengliang YangUniversité Grenoble AlpesSearch for more papers by this author, and Stephane OpertoGéoazur-CNRS, Université Nice Sophia AntipolisSearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017-17734253.1 SectionsSupplemental MaterialAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract Joint full waveform inversion (JFWI) combines reflection (RWI) and early-arrival (EWI) waveform inversions to build a large-scale velocity model of the subsurface. It is alternated with a waveform inversion/migration of near-offset reflections to build a short-scale impedance model that is used as an input to build the sensitivity kernel of RWI along the two-way reflection paths. The velocity macromodel built by JFWI can be used as the initial model of standard FWI to enrich the high wavenumber content of the model. We present an application of this workflow to a real 2D OBC profile across a gas cloud in the North Sea. First, we highlight the footprint of attenuation by comparing recorded seismograms with the synthetics computed in a viscoacoustic velocity model previously developed by 3D FWI. Then, the main promises and pitfalls of JFWI are highlighted using two initial models of increasing accuracy. When starting from a crude 1D initial model, JFWI is influenced by cycle-skipping artifacts and fails to update the lowwavenumber content of the subsurface model. When a more accurate initial model is used, the procedure of JFWI followed by standard FWI (with resulting JFWI model as initial model) succeeds in building a velocity model which is more accurate than the one built directly by standard FWI. This study suggests that JFWI is more efficient than FWI to update the low horizontal wavenumbers along the reflection wavepaths during the velocity macromodel building task, hence leading to a more accurate reconstruction of the gas cloud. However, it remains prone to cycle skipping when a conventional difference-based misfit function is considered. Therefore, more robust misfit function must be used in the future to reduce the demand on an accurate initial model. Presentation Date: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 Start Time: 9:45 AM Location: 361F Presentation Type: ORAL Keywords: attenuation, diving wave, full-waveform inversion, gas, reflectionPermalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017-17734253.1FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017ISSN (print):1052-3812 ISSN (online):1949-4645Copyright: 2017 Pages: 6093 publication data© 2017 Published in electronic format with permission by the Society of Exploration GeophysicistsPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished Online: 17 Aug 2017 CITATION INFORMATION Wei Zhou, Romain Brossier, Jean Virieux, Pengliang Yang, and Stephane Operto, (2017), "Joint full-waveform inversion for velocity model building: A real case study in the viscoacoustic approximation," SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 1422-1427. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2017-17734253.1 Plain-Language Summary Keywordsattenuationdiving wavefull-waveform inversiongasreflectionPDF DownloadLoading ...