The "effect" of T Classification on Colorectal Liver Metastasis.

Lunpo Wu,Hongjuan Zheng,Jianfei Fu,Jinlin Du,Shu Zheng,Liangjing Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.e15049
IF: 45.3
2019-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e15049 Background: T classification is considered as a detail and credible category of the depth of tumor invasion. Generally, with the increasing T category, the risk of metastases should be continuously rising. However, there is a group of metastatic patients with early T classification, who were supposed to have a low metastatic probability. Our study aims to present the T classification on metastatic liver colorectal cancer (CRLM) in both clinical and biological aspects, and explore preoperative predictions to develop a convenient individual assessment model for clinicians to speculate whether these patients, whose prognosis is extremely poor. Methods: Tissue samples of primary colorectal cancer were obtained at our center. Patients with CRLM during 2010 to 2014 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier and Cox models were used to analyze the survival differences. We identified preoperative prognostic factors based on the Cox analysis and constructed a nomogram model. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability were measured by concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. Results: The mRNA array from our hospital showed that there is an obvious difference between the T1/2N0M1 subgroup and the T3/4N0M1 subgroup. Patients with early T classification (T1) were more often have tumors located in rectum, with well differentiation, with no lymph node metastasis and a higher CEA level. Further survival analysis indicated that early T classification (T1) was an independent prognostic factor with poorer survival. When the lymph node (N) status was taken into consideration, patients with T1 N+ had an obvious better survival than T1 N0 patients. A clinical nomogram was constructed based on preoperative factors. The calibration curves for probability of 1-, 2-, and 5-year overall survival showed a good agreement between nomogram prediction and actual observation. Conclusions: The prognosis of T1M1 is extremely poorer than T3/4M1. The prognosis of T1N+ is better than T1N0. It is time to pay more attention to the high-risk monitoring and screening of T1 in early colon cancer.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?