PC088. Greater Exercise Pressor Response at Baseline is Associated with Improvement in Claudication Outcomes after Exercise Training in Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease

Marcos T. Kuroki,Polly S. Montgomery,Biyi Shen,Danielle J. Kim,Ming Wang,Andrew W. Gardner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.337
IF: 4.86
2019-01-01
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Abstract:We have previously reported that in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD), rises in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure in response to treadmill walking (exercise pressor response [EPR]) are associated with impaired claudication outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine whether the baseline EPR in patients with symptomatic PAD is associated with changes in claudication outcomes after exercise training. A total of 173 patients were characterized on demographic variables, comorbid conditions, cardiovascular risk factors, ankle-brachial index, peak walking time (PWT), and claudication onset time (COT) during a graded maximal treadmill test. The baseline EPR was measured as the change in blood pressure from rest to the end of the first 2-minute treadmill exercise work stage (2 mph, 0% grade). These patients then underwent 12 weeks of a supervised or home-based exercise program, after which PWT and COT measurements were repeated. Average age, ankle-brachial index, and body mass index were 66 ± 10 years (mean ± standard deviation), 0.66 ± 0.22, and 28 ± 6 kg/m2, respectively. Before exercise training, patients experienced COT at 194 ± 146 seconds and PWT at 401 ± 293 seconds. There was a wide range in the change in baseline exercise systolic blood pressure (−48 to 86 mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure (−23 to 40 mm Hg), and HR (0 to 73 beats/min) with mean increases of 13 mm Hg, 4 mm Hg, and 18 beats/min, respectively. After exercise training, the average change scores improved for COT (171 ± 213 seconds) and PWT (218 ± 247 seconds). In multiple regression analyses, changes in baseline exercise diastolic blood pressure and HR were positively associated with changes in PWT after 12 weeks of exercise training (P < .05). EPR and HR had no association with changes in COT after exercise training. We conclude that greater EPR at baseline in patients with symptomatic PAD is associated with improvement in PWT after exercise training. EPR is an easily measured ambulatory index that may be used to better assess the response to exercise training in patients with PAD.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?