Cinicopathologic analysis about primary peritoneal malignant tumors originated from mesothelioma Xing
Wei,Hongjuan Ti,Jing Fu,Yongling Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2016.11.004
2016-01-01
Abstract:ObjectiveTo investigate the clinicopathologic features, immune phenotype, diagnosis, differential diagnosis of 10 cases with primary peritoneal malignant tumor originated from mesothelioma.MethodsClinical data, pathological morphology and immune phenotype were summarized and analyzed in 10 cases with review of the related literatures.ResultsThere were 6 cases of peritoneal malignant mesothelioma and 4 cases of serous carcinoma originated from Müllerian type. Most lesions of peritoneal were multifocal and diffuse. Lesions involved surface of bilateral ovaries and fallopian tube in one case of serous carcinoma originated from Müllerian type. Both of them had one case with rare growth way, which were limited to the intestinal wall to form endogenous tumor and block part of the intestinal lumen. The tumor were both mainly in the serous membrane layer involving the muscle layer, submucosa and mucous membrane layer. Microscopically, there were 2 cases of epithelioid cell type, 2 of sarcomatoid cell type and 2 mixed type in peritoneal malignant mesothelioma. 4 cases of serous carcinoma originated from Müllerian type were all high grade. The cases with the peritoneal malignant mesothelioma showed immunohistochemistry positive Calretinin, AE1/AE3, vimentin CK5/6 and WT-1, while CD34, Ber-EP4, CEA, CD117, desmin, SMA, DOG1 were negative. The cases with serous carcinoma originated from Müllerian type showed immunohistochemistry positive ER, PAX, P16, P53 and WT-1, while CK20, Desmin, CK5/6, Calretinin, HBME-1, D2-40, CEA, PR, S100 and SMA were negative.ConclusionsPeritoneal malignant mesothelioma and serous carcinoma originated from Müllerian type are both originated from peritoneal mesothelioma. They have the similar growth way, histomorphology, immunohistochemical expression in some degree. They are easily misdiagnosed. The diagnosis of them depends on the combination of pathology morphology and immunohistochemistry. At the same time which should be distinguished with other malignant tumor with same growth way.