Assessments of Ocean Wind Retrieval Schemes Used for Chinese Gaofen-3 Synthetic Aperture Radar Co-Polarized Data.

Lin Ren,Jingsong Yang,Alexis A. Mouche,He Wang,Gang Zheng,Juan Wang,Huaguo Zhang,Xiulin Lou,Peng Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2019.2911325
IF: 8.2
2019-01-01
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Abstract:This paper assesses different retrieval schemes used for the Chinese Gaofen-3 Synthetic Aperture Radar (GF-3 SAR) co-polarized data. The data consist of 4186 GF-3 data points and collocated wind information from sources including the ASCAT scatterometer, HY2A-SCAT scatterometer, and National Data Buoy Center (NDBC) buoy wind data set. The VV-polarized geophysical model function (GMF) is a CMOD7 model while the HH-polarized GMF is a hybrid of the CMOD7 and PR model. Assessments involve comparisons between SAR-derived and collocated winds in terms of the root-mean-square difference (RMSD) and bias. First, a comparison between the two retrieval schemes for the VV-polarized data clearly shows that the optimal scheme performs better than the classical scheme for wind speed retrieval. Comparisons for HH-polarized data show similar results. These experiments indicate that the wind speed RMSDs for the GF-3 co-polarized data are within 2 m/s when using the optimal scheme. Moreover, the wind direction RMSDs from the two schemes have no significant difference, with values near 20 degrees. Overall, these assessments indicate that the GF-3 co-polarized data are sufficient for operational wind speed retrieval using the optimal scheme. However, wind direction retrieval requires further improvement.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?